Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <192d5c6fac17c0b60d1ef13399a83af8@scarlet.be>
References: <CALznzY5OLci-J9zu8tspyf7mfQH3x2LQA_ggyDooiA3mg8m5jw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADmm+KfmjTza4s0pLAbmw1bxCa-WnxnYcGgY_iN1XyOWB9BpXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <FA1D13CD-4382-421B-8DB6-CD5AE78D30CE@dslextreme.com> <192d5c6fac17c0b60d1ef13399a83af8@scarlet.be>
From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:51:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJwFCa3of3r1osfJfiFsH8mkYGgZRT-Zdgk_YSbTLidH+G3apg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143e3783ae7b305357b56c2
archived-at: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:52:19 -0000

--001a1143e3783ae7b305357b56c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Excuse me?

See inline.


On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Gilles <gilles@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:01:13 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> I thought this had been made clear.  Several months Commons voted to
>> make Math a TLP. But shortly after that most of the people involved
>> with Commons Math felt that a TLP at the ASF would not work for them,
>> so they forked the project and left, effectively voiding the TLP vote
>> since the proposed PMC is no longer valid.  There is one person left
>> who was very involved in Commons Math and a few other people who have
>> expressed interest in joining the new community.
>>
>> So this is a situation where we have an already existing code base
>> where a lot of the people left are not familiar with quite a bit of
>> it.  The new group of people who are interested are trying to
>> determine how they should move forward. There is some talk of breaking
>> Commons Math into smaller components and possibly dropping some where
>> there is no one to maintain it.
>>
>
> The "Commons" project not being interested in hosting those components,
> is the "incubator" a good place for the developers wishing to go in that
> direction?
>

Perhaps before we move to next steps, could you provide some links to the
discussion where it was decided that Commons is not interested in hosting
these components?


>
> What's the next step?
>

Let's get to a common understanding of what went before.

--001a1143e3783ae7b305357b56c2--