incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Bognar <james.bog...@salesforce.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal
Date Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:27:08 GMT
@Stian,

I've removed references to "Apache" from the temp site and removing all
links to the GitHub repo.  The only thing I can't change is the google site
URL https://sites.google.com/site/apachejuneau/.  Hopefully this is okay
until I can delete the site once Incubation is approved?



On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:01 PM, James Bognar <james.bognar@salesforce.com>
wrote:

> @Stian,
>
> Thanks for joining!
>
> I'll remove the references to Apache from the site.  I'm new to the
> process and thought I could get a leg-up by rebranding it before incubation.
>
> The Google site and GitHub repo are temporary for the proposal only.  I'll
> clean up the references.  If we're accepted into the incubator, I plan on
> quickly eliminating these external resources.
>
> For the RDF suggestions, it would be good to collaborate with Peter
> Haumer.  He's using the RDF support on several projects and has the most
> vested interest in that part of the code.
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:38 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Stian,
>>
>> You would be a welcome addition as an unofficial mentor to the project.  I
>> hope you can bring your growing expertise to the team!
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 9:00 PM Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > This sounds very interesting; would you add me as an informal mentor?
>> (I'm
>> > afraid I am not eligible to be a capital-M Mentor :-)
>> >
>> > I see you are interested in minimising dependencies and use Apache Jena,
>> > perhaps there could also be potential for overlap with Apache Commons
>> RDF,
>> > which we are evolving to be a simple intermediate API plugging into
>> Jena,
>> > RDF4j and others? :-)
>> >
>> > It would be good if https://github.com/jamesbognar/juneau didn't call
>> > itself "Apache Juneau" before it has been accepted and imported into the
>> > Apache Foundation, and similarly
>> > https://sites.google.com/site/apachejuneau/ - both of these could be
>> (kind
>> > of future) trademark violations, particularly using "Apache" In the
>> URL..
>> >
>> > Could you change these titles and descriptions to a more neutral
>> "proposed
>> > Apache Incubator project"? You don't need to change the package names
>> > before code import, but I would say having a Google site with "apache"
>> in
>> > its URL and title is misleading. (Accepted projects will get their own
>> > website on ASF infrastructure, e.g. http://juneau.incubator.apache.org
>> )
>> >
>> >
>> > On 16 Jun 2016 5:52 p.m., "James Bognar" <james.bognar@salesforce.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project.
>> > >
>> > > Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content
>> > > types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated
>> > > self-documenting REST interfaces and microservices using VERY little
>> > code.
>> > >
>> > > Juneau has been in use for years on over 50 projects throughout IBM.
>> > > Recently it was hosted as a component of Jazz Foundation where it was
>> > used
>> > > by several projects that make up Rational Collaborative Lifecycle
>> > > Management.  Many projects use only the marshalling framework, while
>> > others
>> > > use the entire API to create sophisticated REST server/client
>> interfaces.
>> > >
>> > > The link to the proposal can be found here:
>> > >
>> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JuneauProposal
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > James Bognar
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> James Bognar
>



-- 
James Bognar

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message