incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gangumalla, Uma" <uma.ganguma...@intel.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal
Date Tue, 24 May 2016 00:53:01 GMT
Since the Parquet is ASF project, referencing may make sense to me,Yes, I
think Parquet project guys can comment on this point whether is it make
sense for them.
>With the usual precautions of a BD scan on the incoming
IP and ongoing diligence by the PPMC we'll be fine.
Thanks Julian for this point. So this should be action item for PPMC. So,
we can be good with voting on proposal I guess right?

Appreciate on the reviews. We can list out if any other points to fix
before code movement may be. Thanks Jacky for cleanup unused or refined
stuff.

Regards,
Uma


On 5/23/16, 4:19 PM, "Henry Saputra" <henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:

>I thought the concern had been addressed?
>
>For Julian concern about Mondrian, the code was inspired by Mondrian but
>do
>not have direct derivatives of the code.
>According to Jacky, the old code is no longer used.
>
>As for Julien concern about Parquet, the design seemed to be inspired by
>Parquet and ORC.
>And if needed, we could add reference to Parquet in the code
>documentation.
>Since Parquet is ASF project, I believe we are in good shape in CarbonData
>goes to ASF.
>
>If any other action item is needed please do suggest so we could make
>correction as part of incubation process.
>
>
>- Henry
>
>On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>><marvin@rectangular.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>><jb@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi Luke,
>> >>
>> >> I fully agree with you. The committers are already involved to
>>clean-up
>> the
>> >> repo (PRs have been created).
>> >>
>> >> IMHO, this step is decoupled from the proposal vote itself: the only
>> >> requirement is to do it for the code donation, after the proposal
>>vote.
>> >
>> > What will the process for this be?  On this thread we have two outside
>> > authors recognizing their own work, but that's obviously not a
>> > realistic mechanism for identifying all potentially problematic IP.
>>
>> Given that this is a donation from a corporate entity a request for BD
>> (or similar)
>> scan results (if they are available) may help. That's how every
>> corporate-sponsored
>> donation (at least dozens I've been involved in) does risk mitigation
>> anyway.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message