Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1626B17F6A for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44729 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2015 10:07:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44525 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2015 10:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 44509 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2015 10:07:09 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 10:07:09 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id E79051A01D7 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so50624580wme.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:07:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.51.135 with SMTP id z129mr42713914wmz.19.1449050826730; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:07:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.72.86 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 02:07:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <565E2332.70709@apache.org> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:07:06 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: Incubator General Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Jacques Nadeau wrote: > ...If the process is 3x+1 and more +1 than -1, this vote passes as Henry stated... It does pass indeed. >From a community point of view however, -1s need to be taken into account and translated into some statement or planned action, that was my point. I'm happy now that this thread has allowed the concerns behind the -1s to be expressed and commented, I guess this will translate into reviewing the podling's use of RTC vs. CTR when the time comes to assert its maturity in view of graduation, in terms of their impact on the community. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org