Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 289C31810D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83519 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2015 21:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83328 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2015 21:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83316 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2015 21:27:39 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 21:27:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9D04418027B for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.02 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.02 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X_HFmxBWB1FX for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7B3B742B91 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5431E209F9 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:27:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:27:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=KuqvjMvLSCmf4ds GEHhB7j24jmA=; b=U4pZcoxhI0L+3pcI+KBpGU9DPUEV041JyMgoVM1OTLqf/4f qqt+hZI0Ue1L0gwEtw4rrHXiRc1WGyltd/ph4hHjqJO8cEkFQ4MLjED2Y+TfoJyE npvb5bOBeN9VMl61+dKzz9R1ac+Jw6DHmhVlxU+ADQev0CRZD136noVKriHg= X-Sasl-enc: NTv54VVaw+cO2evG7l/cawG+gIMjQy58yL+YG+I9/ID5 1446499649 Received: from [192.168.0.40] (cpe-76-182-41-142.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.41.142]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07821C016F3 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:27:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation To: general@incubator.apache.org References: <1446465555.3149570.426574697.76AAA52B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5637A2F9.2000502@zonker.net> <5637C764.9090707@zonker.net> From: Joe Brockmeier X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5637D540.1060806@zonker.net> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:27:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/02/2015 03:57 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature > community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request > for discussion and said they were in favor. It was done on the ML in the > open. What more do we want? I don't see anyone excluded and I'm sure if > there was a new person looking to get involved they would have been > welcomed into the discussion, no one is being turned away from what I can > see. No one is being turned away, that I've noticed, but I really don't see how anyone is supposed to follow along if they're not part of the team already. I will say that the only Jira I've seen from outside recently didn't exactly get a warm reception. [1] Not rejected, just radio silence. I'm also sad to see that being held up as a standard by other mentors. My understanding is that projects should be attempting to create a community that is open, and trying to self-perpetuate. Sure, you can't do that if you turn people away actively - but you also can't do that by having conversations offlist and having an opaque process that newcomers can't follow along with. I'll say again - maybe my standards are improperly calibrated. If so, and "not actively turning people away" is the standard we're going for... that's disappointing as all heck. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-934 -- Joe Brockmeier jzb@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org