Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C791318161 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8064 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2015 14:15:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7856 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2015 14:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7844 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2015 14:15:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:15:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 198CC1A0C37 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:15:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.652 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.652 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzn7fzvMCNIa for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.43]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AF91F2064F for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id l2D61r0072EPM31012FHUA; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:15:17 +0000 Received: from [172.25.183.47] ([199.244.219.64]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id l2D71r0081Pxlnr012DBvr; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:13:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...) From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:13:07 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4EB22F25-FCFB-4A4F-AC3D-147C21739F5D@jaguNET.com> References: <6C5B88CF-C5F2-47AB-8C58-D29639A78E69@gmail.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1448288117; bh=AaSf2Z/B7SQOBKdWpUVduQOXoAAoisINa2WeFkWGziI=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=AYSRslfRLUXmgvzV2bsvdlmM4cx8bT2CFsAAqUCFENpN0xDzE7dfcZwH8+evNbmlK k1WSFbHalEdnqwIsNkwyCf+NEpysVQFcgpL6wRDD1ORcvyyWaatzyexWfSne0MNAbx hQVl3rGIkUc2JvL+XhSb8paANGwMSsDiJtVTgzC6BEX3esf6uVVZU/gaLSKr/54rxE lRtGGzdupMRUzRj9J36P11JXxjbG/ilD/gAVArYqFEMmmyIG50nCHPw2LFMd6+88Nk LIEHzEAj1Hn2WElShLlb4yIQcCDujroITjPvuCHkNBprtxxIb1b86xSlKXIpOrSrmY QY5TQWdOdUzWQ== > On Nov 22, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >=20 > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Harbs wrote: >> ... >=20 >> If there is a disagreement, it seems to be part semantics, part = version >> control technologies (i.e. SVN optimized workflow vs Git optimized >> workflow) and part an actual difference in how to handle certain >> situations. It seems to me that the actual disagreement is pretty = small. ;-) >>=20 >=20 > No, it isn't small. I believe RTC as a standard policy is actively = harmful. > Proponents use excuses for it, but using RTC for trunk/master is (IMO) > always a mechanism for control, exclusion, and a lack of trust of your > peers/community. >=20 Well, I don't agree that it is harmful, but maybe it's a holdover from the early, early, early days of httpd when Brian wouldn't commit anything unless there were 3 +1 on the proposed patch... That seemed to have worked OK :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org