incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)
Date Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:56:07 GMT
This saga jumped the shark right about the time Mary the sonnetor weighted
in.

On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

> Sorry Jim. As an attempt to shut down a thread, this wasn't a very good
> one.  Not a single poster in this thread has a problem with the word, or
> the concept of, "review". It is the process that is the issue and what the
> impact of that process is upon a community.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Nov 26, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, ok... we are at diminishing returns here with people
> > no longer, imo, listening to what others are saying...
> >
> > We have, as a foundation, and HAVE HAD RTC and CTR for years
> > and decades. There are times when one or the other are Good
> > and when they are Bad. Those exact times will, generally,
> > vary depending on a lot of factors.
> >
> > We use the right process when it is Good.
> >
> > We don't use it when it is Bad.
> >
> > Just as 'meritocracy' is not a bad word, as much as
> > some people wish to re-define it as such, neither is the
> > word 'Review'.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message