incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation
Date Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:33:48 GMT
Hi,

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> FYI I have started an experiment at
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc ,
> using our maturity model to evaluate Groovy...

Groovy graduated now and doesn't have a good place to keep that
document, so I'm pasting it below in case other podlings want to use
it as an example.

It will also stay at

https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/576b3c5d6a7022ac4a8df1ef118666456ce627fb/MATURITY.adoc

-Bertrand

**** GROOVY MATURITY *****

= Groovy Podling Maturity Assessment

== Overview

This is an assessment of the Groovy podling's maturity, meant to help inform
the decision (of the mentors, community, Incubator PMC and ASF Board of
Directors) to graduate it as a top-level Apache project.

It is based on the ASF project maturity model at
https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html

Maintaining such a file is a new, experimental idea as part of the continuous
improvement of the ASF incubation process. Groovy is the first podling where
that happens.

== Status of this document
All open items resolved, ready for PPMC approval voting.

== Overall assessment
All the below items are marked OK, Groovy looks ready to graduate,
discussions and votes
are ongoing on the project's dev list as I write this (October 2015).

== Maturity model assessment
Mentors and community members are encouraged to contribute to this
and comment on it.

=== Code

==== CD10
_The project produces Open Source software, for distribution to the
public at no charge._

OK: of course.

==== CD20
_The project's code is easily discoverable and publicly accessible._

OK: http://groovy-lang.org/ (see CO10) includes a "fork me on Github" banner.

==== CD30
_The code can be built in a reproducible way using widely available
standard tools._

OK: the build uses Gradle and continuous integration is used.

==== CD40
_The full history of the project's code is available via a source code
control system, in a way that allows any released version to be
recreated._

OK: Using Git, main repository at
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-groovy.git, releases
are cut
from that repository.

==== CD50
_The provenance of each line of code is established via the source
code control system, in a reliable way based on strong authentication
of the committer.
When third-party contributions are committed, commit messages provide
reliable information about the code provenance._

OK, see CD40

=== Licenses and Copyright

==== LC10
_The code is released under the Apache License, version 2._0._

OK, LICENSE file has been accepted in release votes.

==== LC20
_Libraries that are mandatory dependencies of the project's code do
not create more restrictions than the Apache License does._

OK: The list of dependencies at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal has been verified
when entering incubation.

The current dependency licenses (including build, runtime and optional
dependencies) are found at
https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/tree/master/licenses

Assembling the licenses depending on the artifacts is done here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/gradle/assemble.gradle
so that the various artifacts get their correct sets of licenses.

Release reviews have not shown any incompatible licenses.

==== LC30
_The libraries mentioned in LC20 are available as Open Source software._

OK, see LC20

==== LC40
_Committers are bound by an Individual Contributor Agreement (the
"Apache iCLA") that defines which code they are allowed to commit and
how they need to identify code that is not their own._

OK, all committers have iCLAs on file.

==== LC50
_The copyright ownership of everything that the project produces is
clearly defined and documented._

OK, obvious for an ASF project.

=== Releases

==== RE10
_Releases consist of source code, distributed using standard and open
archive formats that are expected to stay readable in the long term._

OK, verified in release votes.

==== RE20
_Releases are approved by the project's PMC (see CS10), in order to
make them an act of the Foundation._

OK, releases have been voted by the Incubator PMC.

==== RE30
_Releases are signed and/or distributed along with digests that can be
reliably used to validate the downloaded archives._

OK, verified in release votes.

==== RE40
_Convenience binaries can be distributed alongside source code but
they are not Apache Releases -- they are just a convenience provided
with no guarantee._

OK: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/groovy/2.4.5-incubating/
for example clearly differentiates
between source releases and distributions.

=== Quality

==== QU10
_The project is open and honest about the quality of its code. Various
levels of quality and maturity for various modules are natural and
acceptable as long as they are clearly communicated._

OK, Groovy has a long history of being a good citizen about quality.

==== QU20
_The project puts a very high priority on producing secure software._

OK, see QU10

==== QU30
_The project provides a well-documented channel to report security
issues, along with a documented way of responding to them._

OK: http://groovy-lang.org/ does include a "security" link to
http://groovy-lang.org/security.html which in turns points
to http://www.apache.org/security/.

The website also include the mandatory links listed at
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#navigation

==== QU40
_The project puts a high priority on backwards compatibility and aims
to document any incompatible changes and provide tools and
documentation to help users transition to new features._

OK, see QU10.

==== QU50
_The project strives to respond to documented bug reports in a timely manner._

OK, response times on the users list and jira are good.

=== Community

==== CO10
_The project has a well-known homepage that points to all the
information required to operate according to this maturity model._

OK: http://groovy.apache.org/ redirects to http://groovy-lang.org/ for
now. The plan
for the future is to use the former for Groovy development topics, and
the latter
for its user community.

==== CO20
_The community welcomes contributions from anyone who acts in good
faith and in a respectful manner and adds value to the project._

OK, the community is working well in this respect.

==== CO30
_Contributions include not only source code, but also documentation,
constructive bug reports, constructive discussions, marketing and
generally anything that adds value to the project._

OK, Groovy has elected some non-coding committers.

==== CO40
_The community is meritocratic and over time aims to give more rights
and responsibilities to contributors who add value to the project._

OK, Groovy has elected a few committers during incubation.

==== CO50
_The way in which contributors can be granted more rights such as
commit access or decision power is clearly documented and is the same
for all contributors._

OK, based on the standard ASF docs.

==== CO60
_The community operates based on consensus of its members (see CS10)
who have decision power. Dictators, benevolent or not, are not welcome
in Apache projects._

OK, demonstrated during incubation.

==== CO70
_The project strives to answer user questions in a timely manner._

OK, see QU50.

=== Consensus Building

==== CS10
_The project maintains a public list of its contributors who have
decision power -- the project's PMC (Project Management Committee)
consists of those contributors._

OK: will be at people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#groovy-pmc
once the project graduates.

==== CS20
_Decisions are made by consensus among PMC members and are documented
on the project's main communications channel. Community opinions are
taken into account but the PMC has the final word if needed._

OK, the Groovy team has been making and documenting decisions on its
dev list during incubation.

==== CS30
_Documented voting rules are used to build consensus when discussion
is not sufficient._

OK, using the standard ASF voting process,
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

==== CS40
_In Apache projects, vetoes are only valid for code commits and are
justified by a technical explanation, as per the Apache voting rules
defined in CS30._

OK, vetoes haven't been abused during incubation.

==== CS50
_All "important" discussions happen asynchronously in written form on
the project's main communications channel. Offline, face-to-face or
private discussions that affect the project are also documented on
that channel._

OK, see CS20.

=== Independence

==== IN10
_The project is independent from any corporate or organizational influence._

OK, no such influence has been detected during incubation.

==== IN20
_Contributors act as themselves as opposed to representatives of a
corporation or organization._

OK, no worrying signals here during incubation.

**** GROOVY MATURITY *****

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message