incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)
Date Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:39:38 GMT
Boo hoo. Todd said it wasn't about control, and then a few days later said
he was forcing people into doing reviews. So yeah: in his case, it *is*
about control.

Over the 17 years I've been around Apache, every single time I've seen
somebody attempt to justify something like RTC, it always goes back to
control. Always.

-g


On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have to completely disagree and find your assertion vaguely offensive.
>
> > On Nov 25, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> and inherited the RTC ethic from our parent community. I did recently
> test
> >> the state of consensus on RTC vs CTR there and it still holds. I think
> this
> >> model makes sense for HBase, which is a mature (read: complex) code base
> >> that implements a distributed database. For sure we want multiple sets
> of
> >>
> >
> > I call bullshit. "complex" my ass. I've said it before: all software is
> > complex, and yours is no more complex than another. That is NOT a
> rationale
> > for installing RTC. It is an excuse for maintaining undue control.
> >
> > -g
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message