Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DDA118930 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18307 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2015 14:31:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18105 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2015 14:31:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18092 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2015 14:31:29 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:31:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9DF0E180A62 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:31:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.008, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IyHWGdL8dXSW for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f195.google.com (mail-lb0-f195.google.com [209.85.217.195]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 634A1439C4 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbpc3 with SMTP id pc3so2108511lbb.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=07+FxI+iYJhRPhLErXCPB2ZTiCL1iFEqBT15GXivg6Q=; b=LRSomXnWPISdI5HGUDbCJQ7MY0AhpSenkr3Xn/5ZpkeVShfJnFG7N605thzdzShCqt rtoP013Gfdgp9ql0AQKFUvBz72cDjuMe0GaEO81VyGzJW00WcOTa9DZi/IFVle29UaaH hJiY5X5X5RYsr8iE7MZZe/4wBtLXV4d8aeuJ93JoPRlT0RL+yOIdFhiXLMvOMvzfNnqC e1aQ1sW1FPpfH5lIbsOe/EZPnexBXcuxWh7/iposLVzFbnupCSru7wL75D8KsERTBswl pw4a3O2DsJ0GQC9YoU9xi6rZZZ19XSZLDdbX0IP2UL5l8VfaTSIw/MAzZj6efF2HGyfF b+Qg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.55.99 with SMTP id r3mr15068168lbp.64.1444746667680; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.142.81 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <561B971A.3020309@rcbowen.com> <561BBF6D.5030403@gmail.com> <561BCC80.20701@rcbowen.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:31:07 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SOcSyhAfQdCPtxuZDqQt30Ea79Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion From: Sam Ruby To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > For me, I consider being a mentor as I do being a member of a PMC. > Occasionally one simply lacks cycles to be actively involved, but > one is involve enough to see that others *ARE* involved, and so I > am "unconcerned" about my inactivity during those times. > > My understanding is that this is OK and its one of the reasons > why we *have* multiple mentors. Agreed. > "Shaming" inactive mentors would be akin to "shaming" PMC members who > didn't post on the dev@ list this month, or who didn't vote on a release > or etc... I do not advocate shaming. I do advocate (1) making changes to policy based on actual data, and (2) using that data to have personal discussions. What spawned this period of introspection was a proposal made elsewhere that to me seemed like the essence of truthiness[1]. I would like to replace that, wherever possible, with actual data; however uncomfortable that might be. I encourage those that gather such data to be sensitive when using that data. In particular, Ted's noting that I haven't been a visibly active mentor for odftoolkit is probably something that should have been done privately. It worked out fine with me, but it might not with others. > I am not, of course, referring to mentors who are truly MIA month in and > month out. But, as someone said, if you remove those from the equation, > the list of "active" mentors is pretty constant. I think it would be helpful if we had an accurate picture of mentorship. This will help with things like evaluating graduation resolutions. > So the question is "Is there a difference or problem between a podling > with 10 mentors, of which 4 are 'active', as compared to a podling with > 4 mentors, all of which are 'active'"?? I know many mentors personally. Knowing which podlings you (Jim) are on top of makes me comfortable that I can focus elsewhere. Having me as a mentor of record on a podling that I am not focusing on may be misleading. - Sam Ruby [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthiness >> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >>>> Sounds like reaching out to the inactive mentors is a great idea and I >>>> think we have a great example here of how complicated it can be. >>> >>> Nope. I posted that link knowing that my name would be on it, and >>> advocated that we should be having exactly this discussion. I should >>> either become more active on this, or (and probably more likely) >>> remove myself as a mentor for this podling. >> >> >> And possibly by so doing become a great example to others of us who can't >> admit to ourselves that we are over-extended. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org