Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8438178CF for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22183 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2015 11:39:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21968 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2015 11:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21956 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2015 11:39:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:39:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 17315C0711 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:39:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EU0loZdKUPjm for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2C9BB42ABE for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so14832047wic.1 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zm5YyIUI/ubztKRcfYJmUabB5pMC6yIkPxnoh05bxm4=; b=w4QxZVH+5cuwQLtiADaXmq+RWoYzWew1RcMDzHo2Kxdqjdu1vwgQp2qyaPXJTAzLUT f9QLPP9oxzTfsTK+PBXW4gEY6yzPd/NQoyte+547vJ43lLcqWPCfRyntxHeCP67/2Y2j oECDEwOjRDhxxwDo5xh6fKNzC8ffGjKhb7enwDZJwYNWiMiyWImbRxnjjdj+gBxwuDpc ff5WOUBQean7vO5M7JiICYZybBPTahLoXIraVmi5Te87bGesM06qm8YtbB2xceXVV2A2 f95D5EKpEhlacz8+5TG1meLdn6jJ/LiBa7Rq2a2LKL19qIb0lCRWgio1j9drzYAOUAqn 6HLw== X-Received: by 10.194.113.33 with SMTP id iv1mr9831561wjb.65.1444909170320; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (AMontsouris-651-1-109-118.w83-202.abo.wanadoo.fr. [83.202.224.118]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lg1sm6495804wic.17.2015.10.15.04.39.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 04:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation To: general@incubator.apache.org References: <561F7C75.3060306@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Emmanuel_L=c3=a9charny?= X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <561F906B.5030605@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:39:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 15/10/15 13:17, Rich Bowen a =C3=A9crit : > A huge +1, but I wonder about a few things. Who does the work?=20 I guess that each PMC should be responsible for this work, with a dead line soft enough that it allows each check to be done with no stress, and under the supervision of some members in charge of helping them. > Who > evaluates the results?=20 Either the board, or a group gathered for that purpose. > What happens when projects "fail"? Well, I guss some corrective actions should be applied. The question is more about which of the item must be considered as mandatory, and which can simply be considered as optional. Bottom line, we most certainly will have to create a group of volunteers, for a limited period of time, a bit like the shepperds we have in Incubator. Actually, I think that at some point, we will need to audit each project periodically to check if they respect the various rules we now have (and that includes checking the N&L, a task that sebb is doing - and he deserves some respect for that ! -, and other aspects relative to the web site, the packages, etc...). But this is just something I feel in my guts, not something I see as necessary atm. I certainly don't want The ASF to become a giant buraucracy !!! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org