Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D067E18FFB for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80311 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2015 12:53:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80114 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2015 12:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80034 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2015 12:53:13 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 20D6B180A5A for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.453 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.453 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tr3KoJyWqdV2 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.42]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7C47E23052 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.104]) by resqmta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id V0sY1r0052Fh1PH010t2FC; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.114]) by resomta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id V0t11r00V2U0RYt010t2KF; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:53:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:53:01 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <32CAB6FA-D4A0-4AED-82BE-144240DB48F1@jaguNET.com> References: <561B971A.3020309@rcbowen.com> <561BBF6D.5030403@gmail.com> <561BCC80.20701@rcbowen.com> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1444827182; bh=83mz8v0qTdYm2CalzDqwbEI+VwylQuSSzl8GgsRCgM4=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=a9fCkrdDNoyL11FoRaYKK1UHL0crQfkTxqVUKuNC56rWKo13cuWl/qSjBfT5hkWJt q5mr3P0Uv1+vgaiiq8I9Fi22BM2ojCxkqD3eVX3IUb4+fwYmBoZ+LxXRt53Uo7tZeI CMk25op4NnsTaLVtNibnqc/rAf3vvLPGtZRvYoB4DlsJZ/SXqF41Zvzi7PQ11dPqEB hSzUzLeHoXt2E+qcIihXWnzAr/Xek+aP0rtVAuY2DUXKNRddU9cfpy05IzLjZN04AD O3xQCIbDY1sog7ZsZcI4IVZ3P+5xEMLGsjzqr26Jecj4dB4zxJ1dKfR+Q3r+kBsbAo f7wvDHAOS4j2w== Agreed. My only comment would be that I still think that the optimal number of mentors is 1. > On Oct 14, 2015, at 12:45 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: >=20 > It's not activity on the dev list, or even report signoffs, that > matter most. Podlings, especially new podlings, have lots and lots of > questions, especially about infrastructure. Without at least two > responsive mentors to field those questions you feel like banging your > head on the wall. And you start wondering why you left the comfort and > convenience of github and whether Apache itself is fascinated by its > own brand. >=20 > Before you ask, you won't get podlings to send their questions to > another list, because we're all too proud to ask questions which in > retrospect always turn out to be dumb questions. >=20 > It's not possible to measure that kind of mentor activity, so I think > people are inclined to measure the "public" forms of activity as proxy > indicators. >=20 > Julian >=20 >=20 > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Jim Jagielski = wrote: >> For me, I consider being a mentor as I do being a member of a PMC. >> Occasionally one simply lacks cycles to be actively involved, but >> one is involve enough to see that others *ARE* involved, and so I >> am "unconcerned" about my inactivity during those times. >>=20 >> My understanding is that this is OK and its one of the reasons >> why we *have* multiple mentors. >>=20 >> "Shaming" inactive mentors would be akin to "shaming" PMC members who >> didn't post on the dev@ list this month, or who didn't vote on a = release >> or etc... >>=20 >> I am not, of course, referring to mentors who are truly MIA month in = and >> month out. But, as someone said, if you remove those from the = equation, >> the list of "active" mentors is pretty constant. >>=20 >> So the question is "Is there a difference or problem between a = podling >> with 10 mentors, of which 4 are 'active', as compared to a podling = with >> 4 mentors, all of which are 'active'"?? >>=20 >>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:29 AM, Ted Dunning = wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Sam Ruby = wrote: >>>=20 >>>>> Sounds like reaching out to the inactive mentors is a great idea = and I >>>>> think we have a great example here of how complicated it can be. >>>>=20 >>>> Nope. I posted that link knowing that my name would be on it, and >>>> advocated that we should be having exactly this discussion. I = should >>>> either become more active on this, or (and probably more likely) >>>> remove myself as a mentor for this podling. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> And possibly by so doing become a great example to others of us who = can't >>> admit to ourselves that we are over-extended. >>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >>=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org