incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: Starting from the other end
Date Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:38:01 GMT
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We already have what amounts to three paths: there is the full
>> Incubation process; there is is IP clearance, and there is straight to
>> TLP.  We can view these as three points on a spectrum.  Having a well
>> defined exit criteria and only applying the parts of the process that
>> were needed to address deficiencies might have helped with projects
>> like Subversion.
>>
>
> That is well and good, but what I am focussed on here is making the
> Incubator process work as well as possible.  If the people working on
> making a consistent process for other paths would like to crib this work,
> that is great, but that is not the focus of the incubator.
>
> But please, do make comments on the document itself.  Or suggest changes to
> clarify or sharpen the document.

I think I'm with Sam. I think these are related. Or to be more explicit:
the way a project joins a foundation (regardless of what path it takes)
is via a board passing a resolution.

Perhaps defining exact criteria that the board uses to evaluate such
resolutions would be useful.

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message