Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37C21774F for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35701 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2015 15:17:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35497 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2015 15:17:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79675 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2015 13:50:53 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.879 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=7egKRXzQMftomzNpYFDpPOAq9clrZ7UNInEdkOgLzxI=; b=q/Bem8Pgl+Rnn0oNGVpoExms1XXl4VXLqAnPUIbd9/Wu2pxHfQ51K913dNVk5wMJG3 tBKP6SDSMK4ZYoFXPSlMSh64y/IE0LCyzNu7+M3oaCY2XI0h+o66xyq4RLGr0kWwfrHV i8sXd9xRwjB91XXIxLwQ/0NSoM/lPud+N+AyZyr44fm/cyoYPwmw1J41A527zxDdu0kf afH9KZvoIksnmZfCziJd6lIqvDZu2almyH+52wOleLbFjFNQjo8k+n4Kzrl+uDq4kjYD 7zRUAre/jVN58MVTo3d5h/YdT1JYAaMmtSR5DBjfejI4YQeeSpcAAOuPeZgy4bt38+we B9zA== X-Received: by 10.180.8.132 with SMTP id r4mr21319294wia.70.1442929805530; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:50:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Henri Tremblay Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:49:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Evaluation the interest of EasyMock at Apache To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044403bc7e9b850520564690 --f46d044403bc7e9b850520564690 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I'm the current lead developer and are mostly maintaining all of EasyMock, the venerable mocking framework. I'm thinking about moving it to Apache. My main interest is to find a new community for it. However, I don't want it to stay in the incubator forever. So I won't move to Apache if I don't get enough interested committers. The goal of this mail is to find out if there is any interest in collaborating on EasyMock future development. EasyMock is a great and highly used framework. I want you to help me to make it greater. I has also the advantage to be a small framework. So it is easy to understand. The code is mostly clean and is well-tested. The give you a glimpse of my actual roadmap (which is extremely open): - Add more sophisticated verifies (e.g. Mockito style). I think this is a great feature that makes the test more readable - Java 8 support. Find a nice way to take advantage of Java 8 for mocks - Add spies Interested? Henri --f46d044403bc7e9b850520564690--