Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ADC31050B for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 05:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15491 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 05:00:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15270 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 05:00:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15258 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2015 05:00:37 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 05:00:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AE7871AB5CE for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 05:00:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozhwTvKot65c for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 05:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8C2D650694 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 05:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vkhf67 with SMTP id f67so5631563vkh.1 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:00:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tlwgRW+yu5uK+4I6G9/p9z7FuuRzVUj1ZWpbNhyyrfI=; b=a5+KR6QNg+hrAkFxtnz+XmJoQIfNwbKa8wxgTL/wdj+ED8x1pFKCJiI1Y6InCpMvw6 rH546aRBvok6ETiFP1Vz7mRM+QeiXE8exuvKYe7KGpdJ3Sdc6MJ+yyr3b9FC1SWq+OUd hOX7MZDBS3yScaNcWNwz6z/oLpr9ISLbetwosVSnsPvtEwOJMZBaSRDLV43OLQBx+4+K W/bkSdn9ilT9fnlkTafTQwa0ZIwog1znPAe5hRXADcO3ZiNGVecW5erFzR+BNBXqMvyp 78ZS3LVePXCTREnJ38mp1p7NW7P1EOpGJQ6e1Lbt9WbsZmFKchovZYG1HrgZKtv9PP90 JLRw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.119.133 with SMTP id ku5mr2555960vdb.16.1441342830162; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.180.134 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.180.134 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:00:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <66F9BCCB-13B8-4462-A49C-65D639117EC1@comcast.net> References: <66F9BCCB-13B8-4462-A49C-65D639117EC1@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 00:00:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ODF Toolkit may need help From: Greg Stein To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0d09e643aa8051ee4c738 --047d7bf0d09e643aa8051ee4c738 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The Attic is for Apache projects. Podlings are simply retired/removed. On Sep 4, 2015 9:23 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > Hi Rob, > >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:56 AM Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament > >> wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >>> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling. > >>> > >>> This podling has been incubating for over 4 years now. Last month they > >>> filed a report without mentor sign off, without any feedback on the > >> mailing > >>> list. They have remained partially active throughout the 4 years, but > >> from > >>> what I can tell suffering a bit in community growth. I'd like to seek > >>> input from the incubator on how to potentially resolve this and maybe > get > >>> help for this podling. > >>> > >>> John > >> > >> > >> I am the mentor who did not sign off last month. You may have noticed > >> that the podling has been filing nearly identical reports for some > >> time now. I'd sum up accomplishments to date as: > >> > >> 1) We've done a few podling releases. > >> > >> 2) IP review is in good shape > >> > >> 3) Community gets along well, no significant frictions > >> > >> 4) Community has added new committers outside the original PPMC, but > >> has also lost its original corporate-sponsored developers. > >> > >> 5) The code is being used, as seen by incoming traffic on users list > >> and occasional patch submissions > > > > I have noticed that. Has the podling been made aware that the report > > shouldn't be a copy and paste, and that stagnating growth is probably > not a > > good sign? It would help to explain why their report wasn't signed off > on. > > > > > > > > > >> > >> These are all good steps towards graduation. However, the community > >> thinks, and I tend to agree, that the activity level is too low to > >> sustain a TLP. If we were able to attract another 2 or 3 active > >> developers we would be in great shape. As mentor I've given advice > >> when asked, and when I thought needed. But I'm not standing there > >> with a whip and a megaphone telling them what to do. I don't think > >> that makes a sustainable community. > >> > >> I don't think shuffling the code around within Apache, to another > >> project (or Podling) really solves anything. The Attic is one option, > >> but my guess is that would end the podling but not the (albeit small) > >> community. They would probably just set up on github and continue > >> with the same pace of activity, with a lighterweight process, outside > >> of Apache. So, personally, I don't think the Attic would be the death > >> of the ODF Toolkit. > > > > The attic should be considered only as a last stitch effort, all other > > attempts at resolving the podling have been tried and failed. > > Nothing stops anyone from forking the podling to another location. The > incubator would need to do something with the code. That would be to put it > in the attic as an archive, as not maintained any longer. > > This is decision for the community such as it is to make. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -Rob > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --047d7bf0d09e643aa8051ee4c738--