Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E1C317FEA for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77000 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2015 21:31:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76764 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2015 21:31:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76751 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2015 21:31:31 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:31:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4283D1A1FC9 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:31:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91BycXuz4iNO for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A77E3206E8 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 21:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbcao8 with SMTP id ao8so92926184lbc.3 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:31:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=T6AmEX9s3U0fYKaygtbjr7MdR9GEpzZM09an3ClocEQ=; b=mCe2lQbKOShw/XBGmcfh8qK3VKNYA7HsA6QvTNT9uvkYgK4UYE6vTA0BvI0+/ulCk0 G6fuBJYTlLySQxC8E40PsK7GTX+kXAoXKFq+Ib0xw+8R0T/Ih4uamveRZWCk6jrlMEHs P+AuEE3P3YHjqo2ezBw/j8MAimHp8EhTMprk6igeTirLiXCYjXBUya8aTNxWVmHilLwC pKtQzsB16Kv7xo3X2toCWqNIKXU0RWcxlXCsfY/tA9Ssjzq5N0apovZqJn2WiTi5hP5B xGMwBjqMTvhBsUnTnYEdQyK+tQjStmH1coPO6ViK182tHr8C36WmodiSz79woYGD2XyT t/SA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.9.37 with SMTP id w5mr24807946laa.43.1442352682900; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.214.223 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:31:22 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.1-incubating Release From: Stephen Mallette To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014946f44e236c051fcfe761 --089e014946f44e236c051fcfe761 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, the vote has been open since September 8th - here's where it started: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201509.mbox/%3CC= AA-H438vLKoQiJ%3Dcn6CXPYOvueHrvzbBQ_LhKgmxjVkeMceAMQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:13 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Ideally we leave votes open for 72 hrs in case anyone has a -1 after 3 +1= s > cast. > On Sep 15, 2015 15:55, "Stephen Mallette" wrote: > > > The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop passed with 3 binding +1s, 0 > > non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1. > > > > Binding +1s: > > Daniel Gruno > > Justin Mclean > > Rich Bowen > > > > Thanks to those who gave us a hand and added a vote. > > > > Separately, Justin, I'll try to get LICENSE/NOTICE right for the next > run. > > I suspect I'll be pinging this list separately for a bit more guidance > > before then. Thanks. > > > > Stephen > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Justin Mclean > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > I suppose I still could have missed something, but I thought i'd > gotten > > > the bulk of it right - could you please > > > > tell me what you noticed that I missed or misunderstood from your > last > > > > post? > > > > > > Only things in the release need to be in LICENSE or NOTICE [1]. I=E2= =80=99d > check > > > that first. Permissive licensed software (i.e. MIT/BSD) don't need to > go > > in > > > NOTICE [5], I can see there a few of those there. > > > > > > > Does that simply mean that I should remove all apache licensed > > > dependencies > > > > from the binary NOTICE and all is good? > > > > > > Generally when adding Apache licenced software there's no need to > modify > > > LICENSE or NOTICE unless it has a NOTICE file [2]. That means you > > generally > > > don=E2=80=99t have to add much when bundling other ASF projects espec= ially when > > > they have a boilerplate NOTICE file. [3] The no need to add Apache > > licensed > > > software to LICENSE but it not an licensing error to do so. I general= ly > > > don=E2=80=99t mind that as it makes checking releases a little easier= when > > > reviewing. > > > > > > Not that dependancies of dependancies matter [4]. Rather than go down > > that > > > rabbit hole just look inside all the jars in the release with somethi= ng > > > like this: > > > find . -name "*.jar" -exec tar ft {} \; | sort -u > paths.txt > > > > > > Look at all of the classes contained to see what=E2=80=99s included. = For > example > > > with TinkerPop I see that it includes "com/carrotsearch/hppc=E2=80=9D= and > looking > > > at its license (Apache) I can see it has a NOTICE file (which looks > > > incorrect but that=E2=80=99s another story), so that would need to be > considered > > > and possibly something added to TinkerPop=E2=80=99s NOTICE. In this c= ase I=E2=80=99d > > > probably assume a standard NOTICE and add a copyright line to the > NOTICE > > > file - but that=E2=80=99s not the only valid solution. It's may not b= e always > > clear > > > cut what needs to be done and you may have to consider each on a case > by > > > case basis. > > > > > > If any questions come up ask you mentors, ask this list or on legal > > > discuss. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > > > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle > > > 2.. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep > > > 3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product > > > 4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-deps > > > 5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --089e014946f44e236c051fcfe761--