Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22D9B183B8 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4569 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 07:46:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4336 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 07:46:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4325 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2015 07:46:21 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:46:21 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 23D401A0279 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wijp15 with SMTP id p15so50020678wij.0 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:46:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.58.236 with SMTP id u12mr2726031wjq.36.1438933579609; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.145.212 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:46:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55BF3A8D.9020701@gmx.org> <55C08445.5050006@gmx.org> <55C317A7.7030500@gmx.org> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:46:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: apache binary distributions From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: Incubator General Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...is Apache Brand meant to protect *any* possible object/binary > artifact or only those that PMC actually care about?... IMO any object/binary created from our source code has to be clearly identified as not coming from the ASF. If Kermit distributes a compiled version of httpd for example I would expect that to be labeled as "Kermit's distribution of the Apache HTTP Server". And if that's done properly I would expect filenames to reflect this where possible, so Kermit's binary package should be named like "kermit-httpd-2.4.16.tgz" to help prevent confusion. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org