Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEWfVJnY3KM39r+P=zCMJCbsrt=+oVHJek6Z_2u6En0k45H9vQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEWfVJ=J3-fiek0fKo6ZNLzZNS8Kv3_8=oO3jVuSYc5k0zsSzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+uCcrX4o8CkHHrLgb6iRO_E-02Wp7xpJvrVHuj_+h0N5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADmm+KfWHzBKvvO+k+ddDTawS6O37KD0AsWbd01i_2JFkNn+yQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJnY3KM39r+P=zCMJCbsrt=+oVHJek6Z_2u6En0k45H9vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:41:27 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+vicKjFsUjusczCO=NtbwHsTPNvjqAQWux5_1BeQS1eEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Podlings and the ASF maturity model (was: Reform of Incubator...)
From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:
>> ...the maturity model shouldn't be a set of gating criteria, but that the
>> podling should self-assess its position and to what degree, as well as how,
>> each point is handled. Yes, many of the points are non-negotiable, but
>> don't claim that all are...
>
> So you would see the maturity model as one element of the Incubation
> graduating checklist, with self-assessment from the podling and its
> mentors? I like the idea.

+1. Would love to see it being practiced starting from the next podling who's
about to graduate.

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org