incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review
Date Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:21:21 GMT
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton <
> > > niall.pemberton@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing
> > > reports
> > > >> list.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm very good point.  podlings.xml indicates they shouldn't have, but
> > > based
> > > > on when they entered the incubator they should have.  Even going back
> > to
> > > > rev 1 of the page, they are missing.
> > > >
> > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2015?action=recall&rev=1
> > > >
> > > > So does anyone have any recommendations on how to handle it?  I'll
> look
> > > at
> > > > the history to see why they were removed.
> > >
> > > Geode's entry in podlings.xml indicated that they were to be monthly
> > > for "May, June, July".  Therefore, I removed them this month -- and
> > > specifically sent an email telling them not to report, since the
> > > report reminder had already gone out.
> > >
> >
> > Yep, just got to the same conclusion.  It happens.  For those interested,
> > here's the commit that removed them.
> >
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml?r1=1692672&r2=1692887&pathrev=1695191
> >
> > and the May report, which includes them as a new podling but no report
> from
> > them.
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2015
> >
> >
> > >
> > > It turns out that Geode did not report in May, so they only filed
> > > monthly for two months.
> > >
> > > It's too late for this report cycle.  Their next scheduled report will
> > > be in October.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I think the decision to file an out-of-cycle report in September
> > > should be left to Geode's Mentors.
> > >
> >
> > Agreed, though I would urge their mentors to decide that a special report
> > should be filed in September.
> >
>
> I don't agree. If Geode was a TLP the board would have asked them to report
> the next month - and we should treat them the same way. They're supposed to
> know when they should report and thats usually the attitude the board
> expresses to missed reports. Also, the mentors didn't pick up the fact
> they'd only filed two monthly reports - so I think we (IPMC) should require
> it. This is a good learning experience :)
>

September is next month, so I'm not sure I understand the conflict here.
Is your concern about leaving it up to the mentors?  Considering who the
mentors are, I doubt they will have any concerns with producing a report
for September, considering the circumstances.


>
> Niall
>
>
> > >
> > > Marvin Humphrey
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message