incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: apache package naming convention
Date Fri, 07 Aug 2015 22:29:39 GMT
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Hayes <
matthew.terence.hayes@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Roman Shaposhnik suggested I open a discussion on the following topic:
>
> For Apache DataFu, all of the Java classes are declared in a datafu.*
> namespace.  This has been the naming convention since the DataFu project
> started in 2010.  Since DataFu became part of the Apache incubation
> process, the topic has come up of moving all of the classes into a
> org.apache.datafu.* namespace.  This was first discussed in January 2014
> (see DATAFU-7) and most recently again in the past couple weeks.  The
> consensus at the time last year was that it would be a huge pain for users
> and not worth the cost.  It would break any script out there currently
> using DataFu.  Also Jakob Homan and Russell Journey pointed out that this
> is just a convention and not all Apache projects follow it.  Since we would
> like DataFu to graduate sometime soon it would be good to clarify what the
> requirements are on package naming conventions before we do a release.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>

Current statement on Incubator website

http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#repackaging

But, if DataFu will do the repackaging, better sooner (before graduation)
then later.


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message