incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal
Date Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:44:07 GMT
If there isn’t a char limit on project names in JIRA, wouldn’t it just be better to use
“APEX-CORE” and “APEX-MALHAR” to match the actual project names, repos, etc?

thanks
— Hitesh

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Amol Kekre <amol@datatorrent.com> wrote:

> Chris,
> Thanks for articulating what I was going to respond with after talking to
> folks here. We indeed see versions for Malhar and Apex differing. We expect
> Malhar versions to change much more rapidly than Apex.
> 
> Ted,
> We discussed the impact of single jira on versioning.  For example we
> expect Malhar X.0.0 to happen much earlier than Apex X.0.0. There was
> discomfort in naming versions with prefix. The consensus was to have
> version numbers convey stuff. If folks don't have strong opinion on two
> jiras, we would prefer to use two jiras. We have taken up Bertrand's scope
> naming and changed the names of jira projects as follows
> 
> APX-CORE
> APX-MLHR
> 
> I have changed the wiki to reflect the above as jira project names.
> 
> Thks,
> Amol
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Chris Nauroth <cnauroth@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to specific
>> JIRA projects.  If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version numbers to
>> be independent, then using a single JIRA project could introduce some risk
>> of confusion if an Apex version number accidentally gets applied to a
>> Malhar issue.  It might necessitate prefixing the version numbers with
>> "apex-" and "malhar-" to differentiate.
>> 
>> Based on that, I have a slight preference for separate JIRA projects.
>> However, I don't object to using a single unified JIRA project if others
>> feel strongly about it.
>> 
>> --Chris Nauroth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/11/15, 8:23 AM, "Amol Kekre" <amol@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ted,
>>> I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up your
>>> suggesstion with folks and should get back soon.
>>> 
>>> Thks
>>> Amol
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git
>>>> repos. Having all jiras under APEX seems a good choice.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:32, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> As for JIRA, I would apply the same rule, so APX-CORE and APX-MHAR
>>>> maybe.
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message