Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate Ignite from the Apache Incubator
To: general@incubator.apache.org
References: <55AF42D1.50801@apache.org>
	<8EDEABC0-28A5-4DAB-844C-CCB484E97FF9@apache.org>
	<55B0061A.3000707@apache.org> <20150722231648.GU28615@boudnik.org>
	<CAK2iWdRqL+x4NYn8B1iJpYj7UfJGhWzbkGLR2ezTNkNAQg+nYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABuYRcosBZ6D7XH8eJvO95t1TPqHAj4KZ7SBk-XZiYsgZXz_tA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJwFCa3PQAF-tx__z4v0Q-kUDU-Xuaw-HQtSVXZPfiQX65QeZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55B07771.9050001@gmx.org> <20150723062040.GG4306@tpx>
	<CAJwFCa1Uto4Cb_gcoyjMAF8Wmu8Vw04xaWAoLYCzArU072azmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150723185459.GE30506@boudnik.org>
	<CAJwFCa3Q0PJsYLfRd_-RD-SgANXYB4w4=V9po6MxkY9gp02ShA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com>
Organization: Les Arts Informatiques
Message-ID: <55B1F37E.1040503@les7arts.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:12:46 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
	<CAJwFCa3Q0PJsYLfRd_-RD-SgANXYB4w4=V9po6MxkY9gp02ShA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 23/07/2015 21:19, Ted Dunning a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 09:29AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> Looks like now we can put "git branch deletion data loss" fiction to
>> rest.
>>> I think that I am willing to say that the entirely reasonable git branch
>>> detail loss QUESTION has been answered.
>>>
>>> I don't think that recasting it as a fiction is helpful because it tends
>> to
>>> polarize the conversation by implying that the question was made up as
>> some
>>> sort of propaganda ploy that had to be defeated by righteous opponents.
>> No implications of a propaganda ploy, Ted - sorry if it looked that way.
>> However, stories about how one thinks a software application should work is
>> exactly that - a fiction ;)
>>
> Cos,
>
> I am basing my questions on comments you made earlier [1].  To wit:
>
> After a quick walk through the master log I see that a bunch of the
>> questionable commits are resulted from the dev. branches histories not
>> being
>> properly squashed before the feature is merged into the master.
>
> My reading of your meaning here is that histories are expected to be
> squashed, thus losing historical detail.
>
> So this isn't a fiction, nor am I uninformed about how git works. This is
> about questions that were raised based on how presumably well-informed
> insiders describe the process combined with an examination of recent JIRA's
> and the mailing list.
>
> As a side issue, I don't think that it helps to describe the other
> participants in a conversation with heavily loaded terms and phrases like
> "fiction" or "stories" or "how one thinks ... application should work".
> Please credit other people in this conversation with good intent and with
> technical competence. There are real questions being discussed here and
> distracting the conversation from the content-rich answers that can resolve
> those questions isn't helpful.

Texas style?

Jacques

>
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201507.mbox/%3C20150722231648.GU28615%40boudnik.org%3E
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org