Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D014810EC7 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82177 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2015 13:24:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81946 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2015 13:24:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 81934 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2015 13:24:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:24:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 566A9CBB0D for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:24:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bany3JkWLGY2 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 49861428E3 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so15228776igb.1 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=zz9/G2qzG+kOqX2ngTxMN7klMoAeIB9AwltBNJvjWJo=; b=JfZDLgMq2Z/Fcr69MEmhkw3l3/xW0xmU9Olg4nCe5qFSI4BUEvP+UG8gaTllvh7zbb mFEqk8VtUhT0f6CNSULvNb6YuQqoW/ANXqtr3NbxAZGxO6pgC57FtLpdF34oKuG8oBKD L/HYM5WN8qKViQp5wxzQWaj0u2WJ3VIz029UMwVXIGhQ7fhINeDOUmxbwmdMzAJmUc1H jgzUm1ly87E6/UW9OhMiuEMSrjqS+UeLcHvo1SyP/Tk2iWXDflLNuqzgbrk3OkH+gEDI gqpUFuh+L3yirgZc1JsjVAZXOOZOBDZkOBAn6PtJSTTEX086x+1Junt6SOs9Jcw2ewdF fW0A== X-Received: by 10.107.19.221 with SMTP id 90mr4502425iot.26.1433510633261; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "John D. Ament" Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:23:42 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: June report prep To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f876013cf9c0517c5341f --001a113f876013cf9c0517c5341f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Does the Sentry podling (PPMC) disagree with their mentors recommendation? I agree with the mentors proposal for both and actually raised this last month as an issue. John On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:56 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > Marvin, > > Thanks as ever for the coaching. > > One question that has come in from David Nalley is how to deal with the > issue of Sentry. They have had some problems with process and seem not to > recognize that in the report. David suggests reverting to monthly reports > as we try to clear up the questions. I suggest adding a note to the > report. The situation is a bit problematic because there are several people > in the project who should understand process better and raise this issue > themselves. > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning > > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey < > marvin@rectangular.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> The responsibilities of the Report Manager are documented using a > > script, > > >> report_runbook.py, which generates all the necessary commands. Ted, > > please > > >> try running this from a checkout of the Incubator Subversion repo: > > >> > > >> python3 report_runbook.py --month=6 --apache-id=tdunning > > >> > > >> The first action of the June report cycle is to send the "timeline" > > email > > >> to general@incubator. This should be done by the last Wednesday of > the > > >> month, so that people see it a full week before podling reports are > due. > > >> Here's a sample: > > > > > > Yay! > > > > > > With the correct version of python, this now works for me. We won't > know > > > what problems I had before, but I don't plan to care too much. > > > > Hi Ted, > > > > Now that the deadline has passed for filing podling reports, we can > > perform a > > few more actions. > > > > * Normalize podling report formatting. > > * Generate list of releases. > > * Categorize the podlings by stage of incubation and create the podling > > summary. > > * Edit podlings.xml to assign podlings who did not report a "monthly" > tag > > so that they don't fall through the cracks. See > > . > > > > See the output of report_runbook.py for more detailed instructions and > let > > us > > know if you have questions. > > > > I'll work on the narrative section either tomorrow or Saturday. > > > > The goal is to have everything done by Sunday night so that we can send > > out a > > mature draft on Monday. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > --001a113f876013cf9c0517c5341f--