incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal
Date Mon, 08 Jun 2015 19:11:12 GMT
A simple question regarding the SGA... at the bottom there's "List of
software and other intellectual property covered by this agreement:".
I wonder if we should have "Freemarker" under that, or something like:

    Freemarker (including the engine itself, also the Docgen and Site modules)

Because, the Freemarker project contains multiple projects
technically: Docgen (generates HTML from XDocBook), Site (generates
Web site from some XML-s), and the engine itself (freemarker.jar).
Only the last is released to the Maven Central Repo.

When people say Freemarker, they usually just mean the last artifact
(the engine). So I thought the SGA is ambiguous if we just say
"Freemarker".

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany


Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 2:11:29 AM, John D. Ament wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM Ralph Goers
> <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> IMO, once the source code is migrated to the ASF you should not do
> any more releases outside the ASF.  I would attempt to clear up as
> many IP issues as you can before entering but I believe several
> projects have resolved their IP issues while in the incubator.  In
> the worst case some code may need to be rewritten.
>
>
> Agreed, considering the contributor list on the code base is small
> (5 contributors) with the bulk of it from you, it shouldn't be an
> issue.  You'll want to check w/ your eventual mentors
>
> - Contributors/committers have ICLAs.
> - SGA passing ownership to the ASF
> - A thorough review of the code base validating things like
> headers, proper ownership are all transferred.
>
> It's one of the easier things to do, but typically neglected.
>
> John
>  
> Ralph
>
>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddekany@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>
>> But before that... a question. Let's say the voting has a positive
>> result. Can we still do Freemarker releases outside ASF (with the
>> current owners and source code repository) after that? For how long?
>> My concern is that when we are already in the incubator, we can't
>> release from it as far as ASF finds that there are unsettled IP
>> issues. Like if someone finds out that an SGL is needed from X who we
>> haven't seen in the last 15 years, that can take a while, which is OK,
>> but until that I can't do releases (and in general I can't be sure
>> what will happen with the work committed). Is it possible to only
>> enter incubation when there are no known blockers that would make
>> releases impossible? Or how does it work?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>  Daniel Dekany
>>
>>
>> Thursday, May 28, 2015, 4:11:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
>>> <jacopo.cappellato@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ...PS: who should start the vote?..
>>>
>>> In general that's the role of the podling's champion.
>>>
>>> -Bertrand
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message