Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78E2B175F8 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58561 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2015 16:48:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58356 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2015 16:48:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58323 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2015 16:48:18 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:48:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 28C97C9C06 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:48:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ti1XNvFqwF_2 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B765820C27 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so52279010lbb.2 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OPU5K4dM1pYcIqHKMTH2IiqyqiuIUcS1azxiLvVsu48=; b=KhK4cZeNnZwvvc3UUBR67M3dMGMFS6b0PVduQcto25CUeN9/cqG3jubzlA9BlnMEc5 m+6PZeA+vgriQI3WK3GU99Ml7sc03iIMKpQ1N1XkwJtJdOXKr15XugtDYusXvqkhUhNb +9BSGh47RD61o8AfjBO5fHZ/p0tb/raBsKZ7YB08wQsNlSLzB57FEIBx6s+cEZZieI4i OeWWbWqzToYggPmZssXPkSLhG/q9Yt+JJJpsalZqtKIKDNwOQOoC519e+vVxA9VWqy5G HNLROszEdWLr6GJeG0jLBT+o19zhl3YMFsO8cNxTPRTsQgoLHxbdpscGafU+i7L5hCUh 1K5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDOCz3eEbK5Vl8fnO7VuIjV7hO/pjIr9UmpHstAYsk/8DMySji1qJmk/RF4DedqwP6MCCn MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.50.148 with SMTP id c20mr7233031lbo.27.1432918089178; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.29.19 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2602:306:32e5:e8b0:70e3:e6f3:b048:290c] In-Reply-To: <1432902395.4144601.281372473.12A380EA@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <27FE58A6-969C-48C2-BC52-57A5769F3E1B@classsoftware.com> <43134AB7-CB2B-4586-B253-94EDA8CC19AB@gmail.com> <397455BF-4841-4350-9BD3-F6EE99CBF9C0@gmail.com> <1432902395.4144601.281372473.12A380EA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 09:48:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux)) From: Marvin Humphrey To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > Apache Sentry >> >> This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the >> podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator. >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sentry-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAE=hR03kUTGF3s5QCpuUj=_eyry_gsR=w6KD-pvD_-cdCru1SA@mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> It would be perfectly understandable for an individual release manager to >> misunderstand the incubating release process, but it's troubling that not >> a single podling community member spoke up. What's going on? > > Apologies for just noticing this email, and for missing that. I'm > looking into this, I think there may have been a misunderstanding about > the need for IPMC votes vs. actually conducting a vote on general@. > (IIRC all three binding +1s are IPMC members.) Thanks, Joe. To clarify and elaborate: The Apache Incubator is a "top-level project" at the Apache Software Foundation -- like Apache Tomcat, like Apache Lucene, like Apache HTTPD. The Incubator makes official Apache releases following a specific process, just like those other top-level projects do. Release candidates prepared by incubating podlings become official Apache releases when the Incubator releases them. This requires a vote by the Incubator PMC. It is not valid for a subset of any Apache PMC to approve a release candidate without giving the entire PMC sufficient opportunity for review. This prevents, for example, a handful of employees from ExampleCo making a release of Apache Foo that other members of the Foo PMC find objectionable. While the Sentry release glitch appears to have arisen from a misunderstanding, there have been multiple occasions in the ASF's history where failure to understand or uphold release protocols has resulted in distorted project governance and disenfranchised PMC members. >From time to time, you will hear people argue that the incubation process should be reorganized and that the release votes on general@incubator should be streamlined away. Such arguments would be more persuasive, IMO, if it were not routine to catch problems during the general@incubator vote phase. In any case, that is not the situation that exists today. So we now have Sentry artifacts being distributed which have not been approved by the full Incubator PMC. A similar situation with another project was once resolved by having the full PMC vote on the already-distributed artifacts. In my view, the Sentry podling should initiate such a vote, and a passing vote would settle the issue. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org