Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14F4E172CB for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21552 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2015 00:44:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21373 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2015 00:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 21362 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2015 00:44:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:44:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BAEE3C1385 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:44:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74XwcJ7N-Yo8 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp672.redcondor.net (smtp672.redcondor.net [208.80.206.72]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 00FA9204F2 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailproxy13.neonova.net ([137.118.22.78]) by smtp672.redcondor.net ({ab9b8a0f-47dc-4027-bad5-230251ed7875}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20150522004407990_0672 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:44:07 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from [192.168.1.12] (ip72-201-82-25.ph.ph.cox.net [72.201.82.25]) (Authenticated sender: ralph.goers@dslextreme.com) by mailproxy13.neonova.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9D05A3602ED for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 20:42:17 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal From: Ralph Goers In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:44:03 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <05AD6383-A92F-4878-A5A5-62BE4C4E35C9@dslextreme.com> References: To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-MAG-OUTBOUND: ikano.redcondor.net@137.118.22.64/27 I used to use Apache Velocity. However, it hasn=E2=80=99t had a release = since 2010 and the overall project activity has been minimal for years. = As a consequence of that, and a feature that was missing, I recently = switched to using Freemarker for some templating work I needed to do. = The only reason I mention Velocity is I am wondering what relationship = these two projects should have, if any. I am also concerned that if = interest in development of Freemarker is decreasing is it going to = suffer the same fate? I guess what I am wondering is if there is some = way these two communities and/or technologies could combine? FWIW, I=E2=80=99d be happy to mentor this project. If I had the time I = know I=E2=80=99d want to commit, but that has been in extremely short = supply of late. Ralph > On May 21, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey = wrote: >=20 > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Sergio Fern=C3=A1ndez = wrote: >>> ...If you'd need any other mentor, I'm happy to help there (I'm = Incubator PMC >>> and ASF Member)... >>=20 >> Currently I see three mentors and two committers at >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FreemarkerProposal, I'm not = involved >> in that podling but it looks to me that additional committers might = be >> more useful than more mentors. >=20 > 4 Mentors is a good number, though! >=20 > It's true that there aren't many initial committers, but the proposal > addresses this issue at length. >=20 > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FreemarkerProposal#Known_Risks >=20 > While it continues to have a large user base, the active developer > community has become rather small at this point, and we think that = the > "Apache Way" governance model and being part of the ASF (together = with > other projects that are already using Freemarker) would help to = bring new > life and energy to the project to better support the maintenance = and > improvements of the Freemarker codebase. >=20 > I think this is a reasonable plan and definitely worth a shot at = incubating. > The Incubator has a mixed history with podlings that start small, but > Freemarker has an advantage over many of those because it begins with = a large > user base and wide adoption. >=20 > Marvin Humphrey >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org