Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F743173E0 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39068 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2015 12:56:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38873 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2015 12:56:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38862 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2015 12:56:41 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:56:41 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id F21C81A010F for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so19197257wiu.1 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:56:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.82 with SMTP id bu18mr3665544wib.88.1429880199793; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.6.204 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:56:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <553A3B4E.7080205@shanecurcuru.org> References: <55393E13.7000305@intertwingly.net> <553A3B4E.7080205@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:56:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC From: jan i To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043893fb6151c5051477ed9b --f46d043893fb6151c5051477ed9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 24 April 2015 at 14:47, Shane Curcuru wrote: > On 4/23/15 5:41 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > > Infra already supports Whimsy so having a TLP is irrelevant in that > > respect (although on reason Sam is doing this is because infra > > expressed a concern about maintaining a service that only had Sam > > working on it). > > To be clear: is the current whimsy.apache.org with a variety of board > agenda, email lookup, etc. services a formally infra-supported service? > Just curious. I would lobby that it should be formally supported at a > normal level (i.e. it's not critical level like email/svn is). > (Apologies if we already formally talked about this) > if you look at the infra ML, it is not full support like e.g. the mail server, but merely a "restart it" help. That was the reason for my question in order to have a fully supported service (upgrades, bug fixes in response to OS upgrades etc, maintaining the vm as such), infra might have wishes to the project. > > The service is separate from the TLP status. We run the service to help > our own project operations, which we'll do in any case. The presumed > pTLP would be to develop the code; I could easily imagine some of the > code being useful as examples outside of the ASF. Being a pTLP would > also make development easier for newcomers, since code/mailinglists/etc. > would all be normalized with other projects. > I thought the pTLP was also there to help in case of OS upgrades and other external things that might affect the running whimsy service. rgds jan i. > > I'm +1 and will join. > > - Shane > > > > > Ross > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jan i [mailto:jani@apache.org] > > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:32 PM > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC > > > > On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > >> Initial sketch placed on the wiki: > >> > >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal > >> > >> Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly. > >> > >> No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting > >> sometime in 2015ish). My current thinking is to follow in Steve's > >> footprints and go directly to TLP, but I'm starting a discussion here > >> (in Incubator) to see if there are any other thoughts on the matter. > > > > I like the proposal, it is very clear, I do miss one bit though. > > > > If this becomes a TLP project is infra then prepared to support keeping > whimsy running 24/7, or do they have additional requirements on the project? > > > > maybe the response to the above could be worked into the proposal. > > > > rgds > > jan i > > > >> > >> - Sam Ruby > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --f46d043893fb6151c5051477ed9b--