Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+ULb+ssTxd-ZudLbK4Zd4gg0CTr7CRzNe6yGQnMMDiT1F9DHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+ULb+tHEc5N9vDvu526Jmb=te4F3yCwCWWJxxMC07EAz_35wQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55083808.6070605@gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJng1_WL5M3HtnMcGp9nUvmU2OMmmtGjzweReNuVdLRbTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55083C68.5050702@gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJkBe+dmn60B9TRbrpfBsxtCP-Binenwnt-kN2L_1j_6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+ssTxd-ZudLbK4Zd4gg0CTr7CRzNe6yGQnMMDiT1F9DHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:09:29 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAEWfVJk2Yps-Y8sXL9xfV=9ursf2UoN4y9=U+-Ur0-W=3ENX+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Vote ? was [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>
To: Incubator General <general@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> ...having seen some of the issues that came from prior proposals rushing
> a vote, I'd like to see [VOTE] thread to exist for at least a week....

I don't think letting the vote drag on purpose is useful - after
almost a week of discussions it seems like all the (minor) issues that
have not come to closure need to be discussed once the podling is
established. A longer vote would be counterproductive w.r.t these
issues.

So unless new issues come up once the vote starts (which would be bad
- that's why we have a DISCUSS phase) I would very much like to close
the vote after the standard 72 hours.

-Bertrand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org