incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ICLA/CCLA/SGA guidelines for GitHub or multi-entity projects was: [Groovy] Next steps...
Date Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:43:30 GMT
So, in summary, can we all agree that I (Groovy projet lead /
representative) can fill in the form, and say "on behalf of the Groovy
community", I grant the rights to the ASF?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Emmanuel L├ęcharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think we are going a bit too far here.
>
> Groovy has been under the AL 2.0 license since it moves from BSD (back
> in 2003). AL 2.0 says :
>
> " Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor
> hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge,
> royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare
> Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and
> distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form."
>
> My understanding is that any groovy contributor, including the 5 initial
> commiters, can grant the existing code base to The ASF, per the AL 2.0
> license.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Groovy Project Manager

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message