incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pTLP process amendments
Date Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:23:26 GMT
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org>
> >>...The Incubator PMC might not have a
> >> formal say in pTLP creation, but there's significant work that happens
> >> before that, collaboratively and in public.
> >
> > That isn't the IPMC. You're simply talking about discussion on a mailing
> > list....
>
> Not "a" mailing list, "this" mailing list. There's no reason for the
> preparation of a pTLP to happen in a different place than where
> podlings are prepared, which is on this list.
>

Fine. My primary point was: IPMC has *nothing* to do with the discussion.
That happens on a mailing list, and sure: general@i.a.o is just fine.

Maybe one day, it will be new-projects@apache.org.

But I want to reinforce what Ross noted: pTLP should not be conflated with
Incubator bits. It has no place, and that's why I'm being vocal right now.
You said, "the steps that lead to the board voting on the pTLP creation
resolution are IMO best handled by the Incubator PMC", and I believe that
is totally wrong.

Cheers,
-g

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message