incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal
Date Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:53:00 GMT
Arg! hit send too soon.

You should really check in with Hervé to confirm that Groovy was in the
export. I am 99% confident that your issues and comments are in the XML
dump, but you really should check with Hervé to be certain.

Also you may want to ask Mark Thomas what exactly is involved in preparing
and doing such an import. Our own timelines for Maven's switch may not
align with the Groovy incubation timelines... (mind you we are all at the
grace of Ben for getting our timeline for the second export he committed to
the Maven project)

On 16 March 2015 at 09:49, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On 16 March 2015 at 09:19, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champeau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Stephen, sounds like a good news. For us the attachments do not
>> matter much, there are not so many. However, keeping track of comments is
>> very important, because some issues have a lot of discussions.
>>
>> 2015-03-16 10:08 GMT+01:00 Stephen Connolly <
>> stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>> > On 16 March 2015 at 08:55, Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag@gmx.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Am 16.03.2015 09:25, schrieb Upayavira:
>> > >
>> > >> When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the
>> > >> Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set
>> > >> up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues
are
>> > >> *included* in that? I.e. there’s not so much for you to worry about
>> > >> here?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Even if Stephen gets a full dump, this does not mean we will get the
>> > > Groovy part out of it. Ben was so far telling us he cannot give it out
>> > like
>> > > that, because of private and internal data in there. Instead he
>> > suggested a
>> > > json export (which most likely will not contain everything)
>> > >
>> >
>> > Well we are getting the full XML dump because that's all you can get via
>> > the XML dump, but whether we get *all* attachments or only those for
>> Maven
>> > is a different question.
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > > So unless Stephy has this clear with his employee I stand on the part,
>> > > that we don't have that.
>> >
>> >
>> > Clarification: Ben and I are co-workers.
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > bye Jochen
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead
>> > > blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
>> > > german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc
>> > > For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message