incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Ansell <ansell.pe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:54:42 GMT
On 11 February 2015 at 07:31, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> The natural path to Apache Commons Sandbox has been studied, but we
>> think that in this phase of the project, which focuses on the API
>> design and actively involves the developers of existing toolkits, it
>> is better to have a more focused community and infrastructure. Rather
>> than a new Top-Level Project, the goal is still to graduate as part of
>> Apache Commons, that is when API has achieve the required maturity and
>> the project goes into maintenance mode.
>
> If Commons is OK with this, I imagine this is a fine plan -- good enough for
> entering incubation.
>
> I also think it would be OK for the project to decide it wants to become a
> TLP.  Whether the project joins Commons or becomes its own TLP won't impact
> the number of people qualified to work on it.  Some Apache TLPs are
> effectively in maintenance mode and have very low activity, but still have PMC
> members willing to answer user questions, make security releases and file
> "still here" quarterly reports.  That seems like a legitimate aspiration for
> this project.
>
> A potential Jena destination also seems as though it would have certain
> advantages, though my naive speculation is that it might be sub-optimal in
> terms of providing neutral territory for negotiating a common API for Jena and
> Sesame.

I don't think it would be appropriate inside of Jena for similar
reasons, although not just related to Sesame, as there are other JVM
toolkits that we also want to attract in a neutral way. For similar
reasons it wouldn't be appropriate within the other related Apache
projects, although it will likely be used by all of them in the end
(Any23/Marmotta/Stanbol/Clerezza/Taverna).

> In any case it seems likely that if the project achieves its design goal,
> there will be people willing to work on it as long as both Jena and Sesame
> remain viable.  That makes it different from other potential "maintenance
> mode" TLPs which are in danger of stagnation because they cannot renew their
> communities.

Both Jena and Sesame will remain viable for a while to come IMO, based
on the commercial users of both platforms and their respective
communities are both well-established and active.

> Is that take roughly accurate, Sergio et al?
>
>> === Mailing lists ===
>>
>>  * commons-rdf-dev
>>  * commons-rdf-commits
>
> Those sound like final mailing lists rather than Incubator ones.  I might have
> expected these instead:
>
>     dev@commons-rdf.incubator.apache.org
>     commits@commons-rdf.incubator.apache.org
>
> Do you expect to keep separate mailing lists after graduation, or will traffic
> be shunted onto existing Commons mailing list like dev@commons.apache.org and
> commits@commons.apache.org?

I would expect the level of discussion and commits to go down just
after graduation, per our goal to have a stable common interface, so
being then integrating into the main commons dev would be the likely
channel.

However, unlike previous APIs, we do have the advantage of Java-8
default methods, so we can also add to the API while maintaining
backwards compatibility, so we are open for additions even after the
initial version of the API is finalised.

>>  * Sergio Fernández (wikier dot apache dot org)
>>  * Andy Seaborne (andy dot apache dot org)
>>  * Peter Ansell (ansell dot apache dot org)
>>  * Stian Soiland-Reyes (stain at apache dot org)
>>  * Reto Gmür (reto at apache dot org)
>
> Lots of Apache experience in this group.  Four are PMC members of at least one
> Apache project.  Andy and Reto are ASF Members.  Andy and Sergio are both IPMC
> members.  Stian is a core contributor of the Taverna podling.
>
> You probably haven't been getting much feedback because there's a lot going on
> in the Incubator right now and everybody figures that with a group like that
> you're in good shape. :)
>
> === Champion ===
>
>  * TBD
>
> The Champion's main work is to help formulate the proposal.  That work is
> essentially done -- so it doesn't matter too much who takes that role, now.
> Are Andy and Reto opting out out as a gesture of openness to Sesame?

Sergio has been the Champion from the beginning, but anyone who is at
the right community position from the team would be great.

>> === Nominated Mentors ===
>>
>>  * Benedikt Ritter (britter at apache dot org)
>>  * TBD
>
> Benedikt is a member of the Commons PMC, but he's not a member of the IPMC nor
> an Apache Member -- so although Commons input is important, unfortunately it's
> not a valid nomination.
>
> I'd nudge newly elected IPMC member Rob Vesse, but maybe the roster is already
> Jena-heavy?

I don't think that is an issue. Rob Vesse would be very appropriate
for that position IMO given his experience.

Cheers,

Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message