Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of henry.saputra@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54ADD5DA.7010803@apache.org>
References: <22DF3C2B-97B4-42DC-9603-C7E16FB68F81@toolazydogs.com>
	<CALuGr6Z69j5p0OtzD6D9060JwZSvdAcLx0SjmF0UBq7HN_5rTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54ADD5DA.7010803@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:20:40 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALuGr6Zc_-HS99qEJ1YFXKmkud1Tuz6Bekm6hqpG2mt7nRp0mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: proposal: mentor re-boot
From: Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1

I would recommend to remove that particular line about mentor staying
as mentor sake.
Either mentors join in as full fledge PMC (and as committer) or not at all.

- Henry

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Branko =C4=8Cibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
> On 07.01.2015 22:45, Henry Saputra wrote:
>> If a mentor asked to stay as PMC after graduation just for the sake of
>> continue mentoring,
>
> then I would argue that the podling was not ready for graduation. A
> graduated TLP inviting the former mentor to the PMC is a different
> matter, but then the IPMC has neither mandate nor power to remove that
> person from the PMC.
>
> -- Brane
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org