Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A5A610442 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52682 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2015 07:25:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52492 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2015 07:25:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52481 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2015 07:25:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:25:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com designates 65.55.169.144 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.169.144] (HELO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (65.55.169.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:25:15 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.142.20) by BY2PR03MB489.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.142.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:24:31 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.142.20]) by BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.142.20]) with mapi id 15.01.0059.007; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:24:31 +0000 From: "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Subject: RE: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.) Thread-Topic: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.) Thread-Index: AQHQMBn1lMv/SezyXU+WpsO51xpicpzIAvWAgAAPdQCAAxmSAIAAV6eAgABAKICAAFYOgIABPIGAgAAEs2A= Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:24:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <218136F1-3098-433D-957B-AA822A05E365@comcast.net> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [184.11.141.79] authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com; x-dmarcaction-test: None x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:BY2PR03MB489; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB489; x-forefront-prvs: 0465429B7F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(979002)(24454002)(377454003)(252514010)(16236675004)(122556002)(76576001)(2501002)(62966003)(93886004)(46102003)(450100001)(77156002)(40100003)(19580405001)(110136001)(74316001)(19617315012)(2656002)(106116001)(50986999)(87936001)(2950100001)(15975445007)(54356999)(66066001)(76176999)(92566002)(19625215002)(86362001)(77096005)(102836002)(19580395003)(2351001)(2900100001)(107886001)(33656002)(86612001)(99286002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR03MB489;H:BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:ovrnspm;PTR:InfoNoRecords;LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR03MB490355C97C0430FA999170D99360BY2PR03MB490namprd_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Jan 2015 07:24:31.0339 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB489 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_BY2PR03MB490355C97C0430FA999170D99360BY2PR03MB490namprd_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It doesn't need to be in the public report. I agree the shepherd model doesn't work here but I still maintain that does= n't mean it can't work. Accountability, responsibility and reward are what I believe are needed. I'= ve made my suggestions as to how to provide all three Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Marvin Humphrey Sent: =FD1/=FD22/=FD2015 11:08 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.) On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > If you would like to characterize shepherds as cross-cutting > mentors-at-large, I wouldn't disagree. It's costly to produce such cross-cutting commentary. Because the product ends up in the public report, it's risky to be candid -- recall the Drill shepherd review that raised objections: . Shepherds can diminish the risk either by spending more time gathering information, raising the cost, or by being more circumspect, diminishing th= e review's usefulness. Both choices are suboptimal. In any case, the Incubator struggles to get consistent shepherd participati= on. While the fact that Incubator shepherds are less accountable than Board members might keep participation under 100% any given month, my guess is th= at the main reason the number is under 50% and trending downward is cost/benef= it ratio -- shepherds are making a rational choice to occupy themselves with tasks they perceive as less arduous and/or more rewarding. Maybe the time will come to revisit this issue if shepherd participation flatlines, though that's not a very satisfying outcome... Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org --_000_BY2PR03MB490355C97C0430FA999170D99360BY2PR03MB490namprd_--