incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: my pTLP view
Date Fri, 23 Jan 2015 20:12:48 GMT
+1 to both of these points from Greg.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 at 12:05 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com>, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org>
Subject: Re: my pTLP view

>On Jan 23, 2015 8:53 AM, "jan i" <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 23 January 2015 at 14:42, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >...
>>
>> I agree with everything else you write, but the demand for "only ASF
>> Members" seems very hard. If I come to ASF with a community and a
>>project,
>> I really would feel unhappy being cut out of the loop (PMC cares about
>>the
>> community, not the committers following our role definition).
>>
>> Would it not be possible to write "The initial PMC must be comprised of
>> more than 50% ASF Members", or something similar.
>
>It would be a Resolution put before the Board. So the initial mix can be
>whatever you can get away with. :-)
>
>As a Director, I'd look for 100%. But with some rationale, one or two
>others could be fine.
>
>> If this came to vote, I would give it a -1, because we cannot and should
>> not "overrule" an existing community, but merely guide them.
>
>The community is who agreed on the approach and placed it before the
>Board,
>for pTLP status. And only the Board would be voting on that Resolution.
>
>Cheers,
>-g

Mime
View raw message