incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <>
Subject Re: Incubator report sign-off
Date Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:11:04 GMT

On 12/29/2014 09:40 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On 12/22/2014 11:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>> before answering Ross' proposal, I'd like to remark that I was holding
>> off on replying to see whether viewpoints that we haven's seen before
>> would emerge. It seems that they didn't. It seems that we're still 
>> limited
>> by the following options wrt. resolving mentors AWOL issues:
>>      1. get rid of IPMC altogether and move to the pTLP model
>>      2. make this a poddling issue: if a poddling fails to hunt down ALL
>>          the mentors for a sign-off -- reject its report
> -0.5 to punishing podlings for the failings of mentors. That would 
> really suck.
Why not? They get "punished" anyway by the results. This is to me a fail 
fast mechanism. I think they should understand early on in the 
incubation projects what's expected of them and what they should expect 
from the ASF, among other things mentoring. Maybe they made a poor 
choice early on to chose mentors that don't fit their needs. They can 
then ping the mentors first and ask for more involvement, and if that 
doesn't happen, well, change mentors. Or maybe something changed in the 
personal life of the mentor that prevents them from providing effective 
mentorship (and say they didn't get to notify the podling). Same thing. 
In the end what matters are the results. If we emphasized that this is 
not about punishing or assigning blame, but about providing podlings 
with the support they need and we signed up to provide, it would be ok, 
I think.

My $0.02,

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message