Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB6CFC031 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35404 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2014 10:05:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35222 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2014 10:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35208 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2014 10:05:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:05:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.120.245] (HELO nm44-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.120.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:04:43 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm44.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2014 10:03:38 -0000 Received: from [98.138.101.128] by nm44.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.56] by tm16.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.77] by tm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1014.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 294476.6987.bm@omp1014.mail.ir2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 83346 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ocXNwrwVM1lHQ08dyqIoA6RcFp3FfzCng_K.ynCgFrScAAV 1HgZa0pX60kIgjI6jdY5gj9.v5ilLSSWlFyfhDz2QbS4ALYFl7tJOoOwoU8R wjMCzlOS9G0zTpV5uMn2.uQlE_xz6ZQGRqkLy85rxf40uchDSrrhW6qzCedG JylmvIHQelLersCg8WYvTe6s0fz7hPFOs7eMSwozOTLN7_11ppt5IMXITOoK Yp0T8ulZSDMO_b07zPdabi9nwlG4ZAJJYqX88dclNSIHxO6ZaV575NUJsSij tEro.jd8BHMDhUXShtPvhW9hZrQDv.APsH3RG6Jv4klgwnLG8_FIREPXVw9E LDc9hdcJTR9XykYgzG8UMyUD2HJJq1ZAJYMkmaqh8RLNUdfYl_c71447RZxW 6uWP8EYZthk5TQnE6ZCCQVursGyPEh9w3oI4QdUeWFbPXCwZgonziJOQ4ym7 XMEpqSWOEkAQoKGxl7YT1E_HmHFRJ0qKPXw21DRTZUPm8to991Jja8SvOXls 9kc408y8.Jy5k7oFuX7J2A57A.nv8B24TNKUrJdBlRNk6MqVWG_N737jajb9 GoTGm Received: from [109.74.48.129] by web28902.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,UHJldmlvdXNseSB0aGVyZSB3YXMgYSBjbGVhciBydWxlCjEuKSBkbyB0aGUgaW50ZXJuYWwgdm90ZSBhbmQgaWYgdGhhdCBzdWNjZWVkcwoyLikgZG8gYW5vdGhlciBWT1RFIG9uIHRoZSBnZW5lcmFsQGluY3ViYXRvciBsaXN0LgoKVGhpcyBnb3QgcHJldHR5IG11Y2ggYmx1cnJlZCB1cCBhbmQgc3RyZWFtbGluZWQuIEFuZCBieSB0aGF0IHdlIG5vdyBoYXZlIGEgc2l0dWF0aW9uIHdoZXJlIG5vdCBldmVuIG9sZCBJUE1DIG1lbWJlcnMgbGlrZSBtZSBrbm93IGhvdyB0byBwcm9jZWVkIHByb3Blcmx5LiBJIHUBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.733 References: Message-ID: <1416218456.24118.YahooMailNeo@web28902.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:56 +0000 From: Mark Struberg Reply-To: Mark Struberg Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release To: "general@incubator.apache.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Previously there was a clear rule 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list. This got pretty much blurred up and streamlined. And by that we now have a situation where not even old IPMC members like me know how to proceed properly. I understand the reason for this streamlining, but it seems there is no clear guideline right now. .) Do we need to and how long shall we wait after pinging general@i.a.o ? .) Do we need to send a ping when an incubator project starts with the VOTE? .) How to handle multiple release attempts? I suggest we get this straight to prevent further confusion. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Justin Mclean > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 17 November 2014, 6:41 > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release > > Hi, > >> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1]. > > Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 incubator PCM binding votes. What > would you expect in this situation? > > Thanks, > > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org