incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:36:44 GMT
Yes absolutely.

Le mar. 18 nov. 2014 10:33, Hendrik Dev <hendrikdev22@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i
> suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release
> to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the
> general discussion (if necessary) into another thread.
>
> Is that feasible ?
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> Previously there was a clear rule
> >> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
> >> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
> >
> > That's still the rule.
> >
> > The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any
> release.
> >
> > The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now,
> but
> > even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
> >
> > The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate
> process was
> > deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more
> than
> > necessary.
> >
> >     http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> html#Releases
> >
> >     Original:
> >
> >         If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL
> send
> >         a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> >         request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> >     Alternate:
> >
> >         If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send
> >         a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> >         request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > It is not sufficient to "send a summary".  The podling needs to "formal
> > request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
> > general@incubator.  The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
> > process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
> >
> > Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
> > arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law.  But
> I
> > sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC
> member
> > voted only on the PPMC thread.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message