Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D10A017955 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69074 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2014 18:57:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68861 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2014 18:57:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68847 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2014 18:57:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:57:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.172] (HELO mail-ig0-f172.google.com) (209.85.213.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:57:10 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r2so4703121igi.5 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:57:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=v5DL8aM6xvHWOwtmQP+rUByjRm+dhBWaPAtWzgqdAm4=; b=sunYwJ+mTO9OSQ3fgfunlYeQYHQjYnFnvlwvKwqub+8HQ0Bmi9xUwAcawyY92m7ePu w058B+uNr3Q8cSdc4bCvrqi/ZLA73X/X6/ThlDjbUbQnS2quZ6Wu2KY5TwLNv9rpTPu4 L3CO6eketdDUPq10oQ2RNqWuI24qx+4M3MLF8YDYeslcML/ngkxb/cBrKiMn1QBeO7i9 1y7aJ1kEdhfxSjlIXxCmo8FbnTdE6bhndXeFkBb/2cgMx9uahlKRINZx7Elp6m5FHm0F tfCo7/Wh6IDfGaTaNaIewCRKZhO3qhQsYZjdJzXb6ueb+8xabjQEj0+lm/QhZ7SM5ah5 /l+A== X-Received: by 10.50.4.9 with SMTP id g9mr8565046igg.42.1412708228503; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:57:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.207.201 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:56:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ted Dunning Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:56:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3184e21c3430504d9c4bd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c3184e21c3430504d9c4bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The unit test was only on Java 1.8. That problem will be resolved in the next release which will be in roughly a month from now. The current primary target of Drill is 1.7. The number of reviewers for the release is an indication of how the community doesn't view Java 1.8 as a critical platform at this time. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:41 AM, jan i wrote: > Hi. > > I have had a look at your release and it looks good, I could not find any > formal errors. > > But I took a closer look at the release vote thread, because a failing unit > test is a serious bad quality signal for me. > > Whenever I test new software, I download it, build it, then run all test > cases to secure I got it build correctly, where I assume I have made > something wrong if a test case fails. > > Apache is known for quality software and I think we all want to keep that > image. I am sure the project does not take quality lightly, but the > attitude "can be fixed later" especially with unit tests is to me not a > good policy. > > If the software only runs with 1.7 and not higher, then why not make a > simple startup version check, then there would be no problem (of course its > even better to solve the problem). I just wonder how this error will affect > people using the project. > > It seems (from the vote thread) you already have solved the problem, but > dont want to wait for a respin, can you please at least explain why the > project is under such a time constraint, that 72 hours is too long to wait > to make good quality. > > I wanted to give the release a -1 but decided to give > > -0 binding. > > in the hope the PMC will go for quality and voluntary respin the release. > > rgds > jan i > > > > On 7 October 2014 07:09, Steven Phillips wrote: > > > In case there is any confusion, the first email sent out in this thread > had > > the wrong vote count. The second one has the correct count: > > > > +9 binding > > +3 non-binding > > > > I should also mention there was one -0 (binding). This was due to unit > test > > failures when using java 1.8. Jiras were filed, and the fix will be > > included in the next release, not this one. > > > > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Steven Phillips wrote: > > > > > I would like to present the Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release to > > > the general incubator list for a vote. This set of artifacts have > passed > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over > 30 > > > JIRAs closed in the last month. > > > > > > The vote thread can be found here: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAA_-67fAJFB20wGX462wm7BYvoSy3PvydCPgY9uNSEj3HpQRmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > The vote passed with: > > > +9 binding > > > +3 non-binding > > > > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location: > > http://people.apache.org/~smp/apache-drill-0.6.0.rc0/ > > > > > > I look forward to your feedback. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Steven > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Steven Phillips > > Software Engineer > > > > mapr.com > > > --001a11c3184e21c3430504d9c4bd--