incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:45:50 GMT
The standard practice has been drifting in incubator-land.

When I brought this up previously, I was told a few things,

1) the notices required by BSD like licenses apparently should appear in
the LICENSE file.

2) notices in the source distribution only need to include things that are
included in the source distro

3) notices in the binary distribution should include the things included in
the binary distro (clearly many more than in the source distro)

4) maven references from a pom do not invoke a requirement for notices in
the source distro.

So,

If you are talking about the source distribution, this isn't a problem.

If you are talking about notices that actually are in the LICENSE file
instead of the NOTICE file, this isn't a problem.

If you are saying that the notices aren't in the LICENSE file in the binary
distro, there is a huge problem (partly because I looked there and found
them).

My guess is that your next comment and mine as well is that it is really
hard to keep track of these requirements as they shift over time.




On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org>
wrote:

> Not sure, and maybe a bit pedantic, but is the NOTICE file a little thin
> (practically non-existent) given the number of 3rd party libs present?  I'm
> not an expert on what is required there, but when I compare it to projects
> I'm familiar with like Solr and Mahout, they are vastly different.
>
> I _believe_ the NOTICE file is where you are supposed to put NOTICES from
> licenses that require it. (someone else here can probably help)
>
> Beyond that, and I'm not sure if it is a blocker or not, things look good
> to the extent I tested (packaging, keys, basic run through)
>
> So, -1 if the NOTICE thing is a thing that needs to be dealt with now.
> +1 if it is not.
>
> In either case, that would be binding.
>
> -Grant
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Steven Phillips <smp@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I would like to present the Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release to
> > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts have passed
> > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with over 30
> > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> >
> > The vote thread can be found
> > here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201410.mbox/%3CCAA_-67fAJFB20wGX462wm7BYvoSy3PvydCPgY9uNSEj3HpQRmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The vote passed with:
> > +9 binding
> > +3 non-binding
> >
> > You can find the artifacts for the release at this
> > location:http://people.apache.org/~smp/apache-drill-0.6.0.rc0/
> >
> > I look forward to your feedback.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steven
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message