incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release
Date Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:48:37 GMT
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org
>> wrote:
>
>> >> Any redistribution must obey the licensing requirements of the contents
>>
>> so you are right that our binary redistributions need to be checked as
>> well, but as far as incubating projects are concerned it is IMO vital
>> to get things right for the source releases first, and make sure
>> podlings understand the difference between source code releases and
>> convenience binaries.
>>
>
> Based on recent discussion, a review of this distinction would be valuable
> for many at Apache.

I very much second this. I think bringing some clarity at least into the
areas of:
   #1 rules for complete source release tarballs
   #2 rules for complete binary convenience tarballs
   #3 rules for lose sources that appear in ASF Maven
   #4 rules for lose binaries that appear in ASF Maven

To Bertrand's point ASF is clearly in business of producing
#1. #2 at least has a nice property of being self-contained.
#3 and #4 are the trickiest for me to get my head around.

Thanks,
Roman.

P.S. Btw, am I missing any other way that we push anything
that can be thought of as a release to ASF infrastrcture?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message