Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of john.d.ament@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.46 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF1aazAZMkEJ54qq34y3pMbKNovG-WBEe4c0r4GNRd71_w+vtg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAF1aazCJHWh3jO4fyANePQiiJCe3AKy2gf=j9SHZcyRfUbM9AQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVYE0PNotRnZFHvj3b9GNb=UZgS8hjFRT8ABehQGp9wBxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF1aazC+2r2XP9MTUBSYpEbhWpy1iCmyn-PB7cEZmCa1vnCqZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOqetn8V__v_37cqmA1P4dz4Hs+8P_yChV3DBaauhodFyKdKew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF1aazDYD-CBQjB6YcM+HtBGHafb75sJ5Pw+zd7o4ncUCiVqRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF1aazBUHvQ0JpmMLTbWA1H2GzUT+DQUg0R--JD7cXT+J4HqQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOqetn-rKKFRAxDPdcuV-WOU4PBaL5EJ21qHZKgNkjG86YSvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANyrgvd34Gz2gysmoqzAA9TuDr39_uLtmK_GV0m84kOgzxOBbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5406A53C.6030205@apache.org>
	<CAF1aazDsXQRLEVTHbVxxmpFyGqMjafWXFy_nUcXm3=sRgX5-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOqetn8S+H=DxytGEqbA+SeyCmU1dWhqUxEiCXyA0LCFam6aCw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF1aazAZMkEJ54qq34y3pMbKNovG-WBEe4c0r4GNRd71_w+vtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:14:43 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAOqetn8zhLCrGMJkmL4H3_UYOqrsX4xy6RM1Y6FgE4FnTRRDZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) -
 CORRECTION
From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d375a5daa8d0502282e63

--047d7b5d375a5daa8d0502282e63
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Dave <snoopdave@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:29 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dave <snoopdave@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Branko =C4=8Cibej <brane@apache.org> =
wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote:
> > > > > Hi John
> > > > > I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of
> multiple
> > > > > release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing
> any
> > > > > previous version up accidentally. This is very common and current=
ly
> > > done
> > > > in
> > > > > many TLP's including Thrift, Mesos, and Cassandra to name a few.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed. And it is (or should be) normal process to start a new vote
> for
> > > > every new set of release bits. Even if 1.0.0 is just a repackaging =
of
> > > > 1.0.0-rc4, there may be bugs in the packaging process itself (such =
as
> > > > we've seen in this thread, when files that were not intended to be
> > > > released were bundled in the release artefacts), so the PPMC should
> > test
> > > > and vote again.
> > >
> > >
> > > But, if 1.0.0 is not a repackage but instead the *exact* same set of
> > files
> > > as 1.0.0-rc4 but each has been renamed to remove the rc4 designation
> then
> > > voting again is redundant and unnecessary. Do you agree?
> > >
> >
> > How could you possibly do that without updating the source code?
> Certainly
> > there's something, even if just a pom file, that mentions the version #
> and
> > should refer back to an exact git tag/revision (in your case).
> >
>
>
> No need for that. All you do is this, for example:
>
> svn mv apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz
> apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-source.tar.gz
>


So - just to confirm.  If I look at
apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the
pom.xml files will read the version "1.0.0-rc5" and the git tag will also
read "1.0.0-rc5" then after you do an svn mv the pom files will be updated
to read "1.0.0" ? If you look at Cassandra, this is how they do it.  See
[1] and [2].


>
> - Dave
>


[1]: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/releases
[2]:
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-2.1.0-rc6/build.xml#L28

--047d7b5d375a5daa8d0502282e63--