incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: Mentors heartbeat
Date Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:02:04 GMT
Hi Guys,

So I spent some time this weekend updating my scripts. They now fully
process missing ticks as well. Here is the list they generated of mentors
from January 2012 - August 2014 that did *not* sign off on a report (note
I'm at the top, bad mentor Chris). The results are a LOT better for wiki
reports with the [ ] mentor name (id) pattern - for those old "Signed off
by
mentor:" patterns, my tool cannot sniff them (in the negative) since if
they
didn't sign off, I don't know who was supposed to. I suppose I could have
cross
reffed the mentor list for the podling at the time, but another day,
another
dollar :) Here you go, for now. To replicate:

1. git clone https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff
2. cd apachestuff
3. ./incubator_mentor_tally

(note you'll need to install Apache Tika into /usr/local/tika and
then alias it to "tika"):

25 mattmann
  23 omalley
  21 acmurthy
  19 olamy
  19 ddas
  15 jbonofre
  14 mnour
  13 antelder
  11 hgomez
  10 mfranklin
  10 gates
  10 asavory
  10 akarasulu
   9 jim
   9 cdouglas
   8 tdunning
   8 hashutosh
   8 benh
   8 asavu
   7 tomwhite
   7 mahadev
   7 jukka
   6 struberg
   6 rubys
   6 nslater
   5 yegor
   5 vanto
   5 tomdz
   5 sanjiva
   5 radup
   5 pramirez
   5 ke4qqq
   5 craigmcc
   4 stevenn
   4 srowen
   4 snoopdave
   4 smarru
   4 rgardler
   4 pauls
   4 niq
   4 nick
   4 mpierce
   4 marrs
   4 kevan
   4 jzb
   4 enis
   4 cutting
   4 chipchilders
   4 ahart
   3 vkaggal
   3 rvs
   3 rbircher
   3 lresende
   3 jochen
   3 hogstrom
   3 henning
   3 gstein
   3 grobmeier
   3 clr
   2 tomaz
   2 thorsten
   2 mriou
   2 larsh
   2 jghoman
   2 isabel
   2 humbedooh
   2 dkulp
   2 carlos
   2 brianm
   2 berndf
   2 ate
   2 arvind
   1 white
   1 vinodkv
   1 todd
   1 thomas
   1 nandana
   1 lewismc
   1 jfarrell
   1 hsaputra
   1 fchrist
   1 dennisl
   1 azeez
   1 apurtell



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <Chris.A.Mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 3:59 PM
To: "<general@incubator.apache.org>" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Mentors heartbeat

>Try out my scripts - they take on that precise philosophy and try to make
>sense of what is already there
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 3:54 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi -
>> 
>> I've been too busy to do more than lurk occasionally. Consequently I am
>>not mentoring and not shepherding lately.
>> 
>> I do want to add something to this debate. PMCs write their board
>>reports to the board in whatever way they want. The Incubator is about
>>teaching PPMCs how to become PMCs. We can make it easy for our purposes,
>>but we don't need to add more tooling and process to being a Podling.
>>Doing such may serve the IPMC, but it may harm our clutch of podlings.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> 
>>> On Aug 24, 2014, at 11:07 AM, jan i wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 24 August 2014 19:54, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What's good for the goose is good for the gander.  Having the board
>>>> report in machine readable formats provides the same advantages as
>>>>that
>>>> afforded incubator reports.
>>>> 
>>>> If these machine readable reports work out, I see no reason why they
>>>>would
>>>> not, then I predict an explosion of tool driven processes, e.g.
>>>>release
>>>> voting, podling acceptance and graduation votes, etc.
>>> I think you forget one important factor...the human one, to make the
>>>board
>>> reports in yaml, we need to convince the board, and I not convinced
>>>they
>>> have a futuristic view as you have. You might also find, just a small
>>> number of course, people who resist to using svn and want git, so we
>>>might
>>> end up with split data.
>>> 
>>> But I do agree with your POW, and would like to more automated
>>>processes.
>>> 
>>> rgds
>>> jan i.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message