incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release
Date Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:17:34 GMT
Hey John,

Thanks for the vote and the information.  I didn't even realize that the
dist.a.o/dev folder existed at until I read your reference at [1].  Always
new things to learn.  I guess that is another option as opposed to the old
skool people.a.o.

[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc


On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:48 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> > > approves
> > > that release:
> > >
> > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > > directories" [1]
> > >
> > > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this
> piece
> > > of information:
> > >
> > > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > > make available release candidates. " [1]
> > >
> > I do agree with your POW. Important is:
> > - The release bits are in SVN
> > - The PMC vote is based on the same location presented for IPMC vote.
> >
> > dist.a.o is for approved releases, and I have found no "rule" stating a
> > mandatory location to use for the vote itself.
> >
> >
> Hmm Ok, now that I re-read the maven and release policy at [1] and [2], I
> guess it's a wherever it ends up type of thing.
>
> With that said, I'll switch to a +1
>
> [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc
>
>
> >
> > rgds
> > jan i.
> >
> > >
> > > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received
> approval
> > > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sorry, I have to vote -1
> > > >
> > > > The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> > > >
> > > > If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> > concerns:
> > > > >
> > > > > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > >
> > > > > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional
> copyright
> > > and
> > > > > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> > > > >
> > > > > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > >
> > > > > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> > > tests.
> > > > >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because
> of
> > > > their
> > > > > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source
> > code.
> > > > >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but
> are
> > > for
> > > > > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> > > > > purposes.
> > > > >
> > > > > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > > vs 0.5.0)
> > > > >
> > > > > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature
of
> > the
> > > > > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in
> the
> > > > > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> > candidates
> > > so
> > > > > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> > candidate
> > > > > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> > > Apache
> > > > > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> > For
> > > > > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> > > > > strategy thus far:
> > > > >
> > > > > our m1 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> > (approved)
> > > > -->
> > > > > and distributed as
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > our 0.4.0 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1
> (approved)
> > > -->
> > > > > distributed as
> > > > >
> > >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> > > > >
> > > > > our 0.5.0 release:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> > process.
> > > > >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> > > external
> > > > > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks again for your feedback,
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <
> > john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> > > > > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> > > > > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> > > > (0.5.0.rc2
> > > > > vs
> > > > > > 0.5.0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > John
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <
> > jacques@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> > > > release
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
> > have
> > > > > passed
> > > > > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements
> with
> > > over
> > > > > 100
> > > > > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback
in
> our
> > > > > > previous
> > > > > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing
our
> > license
> > > > and
> > > > > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> > > that
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote passed with:
> > > > > > > +5 binding
> > > > > > > +6 non-binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Jacques
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message