incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan i <j...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating)
Date Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:29:20 GMT
On 3 September 2014 09:46, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> What is not stated on the VOTE to general@ is how long this thread is open
> for.
> It does however state the trouble that Usergrid has transitioned to being a
> compliant (codewise) podling.
> I notice (and thank you) for not VETO'ing this RC.
> I do however also accept that the release candidate naming is off.
> I have however thoroughly, as a mentor of this podling, reviewed, and
> provided patches to bring this codebase up to (hopefully satisfactory)
> scratch.
> We bring the Usergrid 1.0 release candidate to the IPMC as we think it is
> suitable for release.
> Non-blocking issues aside e.g. renaming of artifacts in Apache servers SVN
> is trivial to me and I will therefore, as a member of IPMC provide my +1
> Thank you Usergrid community for pushing on this codebase. It has not been
> easy and I really thank everyone for persistent attitude to driving home
> this agenda.
> If the renaming of artifacts is the only issue which can be identified with
> this release (which is what the Usergrid community has VOTE'd on) as
> blocking then we can easly address this and respin an RC for IPMC VOTE'ing.
> Thank you IPMC.
> Lewis
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:57 AM, <
> dev-digest-help@usergrid.incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
>

Hi.

Having looked into the code and release discussion, its obvious that the
project still has some miles to go
- voting for the correct release (naming)
- dependencies missing in NOTICE
- the release bits not being available in SVN at the time of voting
  This is particulary important, because the PMC vote on one thing and you
release another,
  however small the changes, legally you have not voted on whats being
released.
- Confusion about a library that should not have been included
- Images, which are part of the release, but are to be ignored.

The project have already acted on some of the issues, I would prefer the
project acted on the last ones as well and respun both votes.

+0 (binding) with a clear signal, solve the above and you get a +1 fast.

rgds
jan i

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message