incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release
Date Mon, 08 Sep 2014 23:12:24 GMT
Is the new process documented somewhere?




On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:
> > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> something
> > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC
> approves
> > that release:
> >
> > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main
> > directories" [1]
> >
> > For this candidate, as with our last two releases, we followed this piece
> > of information:
> >
> > "It is traditional that release managers use their Apache home space to
> > make available release candidates. " [1]
>
> Historic tradition; that was before svnpubsub.
>
> Note that the DEV tree at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/xyz
>
> is NOT published to www.apache.org/dist
>
> The svnpubsub process takes releases from the RELEASE tree at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/xyz
>
> Since they have the same parent, one can use svn move (or svnmucc) to
> transfer the files from dev to release area.
> This provides traceability (assuming the the release vote includes the
> SVN revision number)
>
> > To date, we only push to dist.apache.org once we have received approval
> > here.  Can you point me to the guidelines that lead you to believe that
> > this must be staged on dist.apache.org?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jacques
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, I have to vote -1
> >>
> >> The release is not staged in the proper place (e.g.
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ )
> >>
> >> If this gets moved, I can vote +1
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi John,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the feedback.  I'd like to respond to each of your
> concerns:
> >> >
> >> > >>Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> >> >
> >> > The notice file states:  "Please see LICENSE for additional copyright
> and
> >> > licensing information." The LICENSE file contains the MIT license.
> >> >
> >> > >>Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> >> >
> >> > These are small sample data files that are used to do various unit
> tests.
> >> >  They have been approved on both of our previous releases because of
> >> their
> >> > small size (<24k combined) and the fact that they are not source code.
> >> >  These are raw data files that happen to be binary in nature but are
> for
> >> > all purposes the same as example json files we include for testing
> >> > purposes.
> >> >
> >> > >> Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> >> (0.5.0.rc2
> >> > vs 0.5.0)
> >> >
> >> > The name of the release candidate directory is due to the nature of
> the
> >> > Apache voting process.  Each time we have a release candidate in the
> >> > community, we hold a vote.  We always maintain past release
> candidates so
> >> > that we can refer back to them.  All artifacts in the release
> candidate
> >> > hold the release/public names and will ultimately be hosted on the
> Apache
> >> > distribution servers at the appropriately named release directory.
> For
> >> > historical perspective on this, see the following that has been our
> >> > strategy thus far:
> >> >
> >> > our m1 release:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc2 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc3 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-1.0.0-m1.rc4
> (approved)
> >> -->
> >> > and distributed as
> >> >
> >>
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-1.0.0-m1-incubating/
> >> >
> >> > our 0.4.0 release:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc0 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.4.0.rc1 (approved)
> -->
> >> > distributed as
> >> >
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/drill/drill-0.4.0-incubating/
> >> >
> >> > our 0.5.0 release:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc0 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc1 (fail)
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2 (pending)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > As you can see, the rc numbers are only used during the voting
> process.
> >> >  Once we get approval from the incubator, we drop the rc so that
> external
> >> > consumers aren't confused by failed released candidates.
> >> >
> >> > Hopefully this satisfies your concerns and you can vote +1 for our
> >> release.
> >> >
> >> > thanks again for your feedback,
> >> > Jacques
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:09 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Your NOTICE file is missing MIT license.
> >> > > Your source file includes binaries in the sample-data directory.
> >> > > Ideally, your directory name should match the release version
> >> (0.5.0.rc2
> >> > vs
> >> > > 0.5.0)
> >> > >
> >> > > John
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > It is my pleasure to present the Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating
> >> release
> >> > to
> >> > > > the general incubator list for a vote.  This set of artifacts
have
> >> > passed
> >> > > > our drill-dev vote and incorporate a number of improvements with
> over
> >> > 100
> >> > > > JIRAs closed in the last month.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As part of this release, we looked to address the feedback in
our
> >> > > previous
> >> > > > release from the general list.  This included enhancing our
> license
> >> and
> >> > > > notice files as well as clearly delineating binary dependencies
> that
> >> > are
> >> > > > distributed as part of our convenience binary.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The vote thread can be found here:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD=L9KLQbNe2BKXKn=H34r0=3booBBd_3UHzeojC9K84Pg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The vote passed with:
> >> > > > +5 binding
> >> > > > +6 non-binding
> >> > > >
> >> > > > You can find the artifacts for the release at this location:
> >> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jacques/apache-drill-0.5.0.rc2/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I look forward to your feedback.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Jacques
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message