Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DC511074A for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40124 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2014 11:11:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39107 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2014 11:11:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39099 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2014 11:11:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:11:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.192.178] (HELO mail-pd0-f178.google.com) (209.85.192.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:11:33 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x10so854692pdj.23 for ; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uEIS4z2ksRIaUkTsZSLGYn7WLCpRE3KXjAa4M0AumKQ=; b=LPxrJN32JXRNYI3Om9ZVuPpG/OBKgEooQ0b2q22cjYCejQPFNcYSw+mGpgU4JtDtBP ayhot6/yPRSPqQajRLWWByBjxrQGCgilWW/+hP9M7oxaJjUkPxiLB6+kMwmwAF+fil0p HPBTDAwoYyNlITAE/ElvYZmM82/YuUXQ0zXCO0FQjHG5HFagKh/Pf4RiheOecpXonpP2 5ixFmKblwHX+5UXbEOddN1r6MOSWozAOKVSI0fg9iKfQfdMcQzs4waa6+LoRM7cJkoyn 5rUMuzOg/kioIS9QjtzrJlNZG2qfiSuRzqSuBQ1Z4TM48TMfs27VJ29X7Gdv8+rAPoSM GRXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmiFpb0Aq9ir8fAckmR7O4N0H8Zn0qXaDzpDfkOmCRkZeAi/nxx5vKc6qnWxfSfkbozDDEx MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.240.103 with SMTP id vz7mr3765085pac.37.1396955470389; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.73.132 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [65.122.198.30] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 04:11:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: When to sign-off on Incubator reports? From: Marvin Humphrey To: "general@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > If a podling you are mentoring completes its report late, and there > are sections of it you are concerned with, should you sign off on it? > > I've pinged the community about my concern, but I'm worried it won't > be addressed in time for submission tomorrow. > > If I sign off on the report, it looks like I endorse it. If I don't, > it looks like I am inattentive. > > I pinged about getting the report done last week, and only just > noticed it was added to the wiki without an announcement. In my opinion, we should remove that podling's report and submit next month. There is little harm in delaying, and reports submitted late do not leave us time for proper review. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org