incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: Retired podlings - should SVN trees be moved under a RETIRED subtree?
Date Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:43:56 GMT

On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:39 AM, sebb wrote:

> I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled
> because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then
> authorization.
> 
> However it now occurs to me that it might be easier to navigate the
> incubator svn tree if the retired podling svn trees were moved under
> incubator/RETIRED instead.
> 
> i.e.
> 
> incubator/alois=> incubator/RETIRED/alois
> 
> This would have some advantages:
> - the top-level incubator/ tree would only show current podlings (and
> lazy graduates!).

Good.

> - it would be obvious which SVN trees were retired without needing to
> open the sub-tree

Good.

> - it might make it simpler to set up the correct svn mailer/auth permissions

I don't have an opinion on this.
> 
> The main disadvantage that I can see is that the SVN URL in the status
> file would be incorrect. This could of course be corrected.

I think this is a fair tradeoff against the benefits above.

Craig
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message