incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0
Date Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:33:41 GMT
On 29 March 2014 04:08, Sravya Tirukkovalur <sravya@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I cherry-picked the above commit (Sentry-119) into the 1.3.0 local release
> branch.
>
> Now the size of the artifact is 335K and it also has the required files
> like DISCLAMIER. I can go ahead and push the change if thats ok.

Please ensure that there is a Git tag that corresponds exactly to the
files in the source release.
That is the only practical way to show that the files have been
audited as suitable for release, and to establish provenance.

Since tags are not immutable, please also include the hash of the tag
in the e-mail vote.

Note: there may be some files in the tag that are not in the source
release (e.g. .gitignore can be omitted) however there should not be
any files in the release that are not directly derived from the tag.
Otherwise how can reviewers know whether the file is licensed to be
distributed?

It should be possible to compare the git tag with the source release.
Any discrepancies need to be investigated as above.

> Regards,
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Brock Noland <brock@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think the 500MB issue was because we moved the .tar.gz files the
>> build downloads to a directory called "thirdparty" as opposed to "target".
>>
>> I made this change because downloading those files after a clean took a
>> very long time for yokels like myself.
>>
>> Some of the issues would be fixed by cherry-picking:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-sentry/commit/06d2b34915a86fb4dcf6b312056a8e7c8475aa48
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > -1. The release artifact seems to be totally wrong to me, I think it
>> > was built incorrectly/accidentally, it certainly wasn't built the same
>> > way as the 1.2.0 release artifact.
>> >
>> > Some of the problems:
>> > 1) the artifact is 500MB - the previous artifact (1.2.0) was 86k,
>> > unless you added tons of test data I think this should be a red
>> > flag...
>> > 2) it contains a lib directory with tons of third party binary artifacts
>> > 3) many of the required files are missing (such as DISCLAIMER)
>> >
>> > Are you following the "how to release" process? Perhaps it's not
>> > updated per the last release?
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SENTRY/How+to+Release
>> >
>> > I think you need to step back and look into what happened. Compare the
>> > release artifact that you generate to the previous release. Read and
>> > understand the details here before you attempt to cut a release:
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>> >
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Ramachandran, Karthik
>> > <kramachandran@iqt.org> wrote:
>> > > This is a release of Apache Sentry, version 1.3.0-incubating
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/Ckp
>> > >
>> > > Source files :
>> http://people.apache.org/~kramachandran/sentry-1.3.0-rc0/
>> > >
>> > > Tag to be voted on (rc0):
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.3.0-rc0
>> > >
>> > > Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
>> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc
>> > >
>> > > Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
>> > (tag).
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Karthik Ramachandran
>> > >
>> > > ---
>> > > Lab41 Team Manager
>> > > In-Q-Tel /  Lab41
>> > > Cell: 571-455-5576
>> > > E-mail: kramachandran@iqt.org<mailto:kramachandran@iqt.org> ,
>> > kramachandran@apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > "This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, may contain information that
>> > is privileged, proprietary, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure
>> > under law and are intended only for the designated addressee(s). If you
>> are
>> > not the intended recipient of this message, or a person authorized to
>> > receive it on behalf of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> > that you must not use, disseminate, copy in any form, or take any action
>> > based upon the email or information contained therein. If you have
>> received
>> > this email in error, please permanently and immediately delete it and any
>> > copies of it, including any attachments, and promptly notify the sender
>> at
>> > In-Q-Tel by reply e-mail, fax: 703-248-3001, or phone: 703-248-3000.
>> > Thank you for your cooperation."
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sravya Tirukkovalur

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message