incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating RC4
Date Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:16:55 GMT
Please do file the ticket to address the Disclaimer file for the release.

On Thursday, March 13, 2014, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org> wrote:

> Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes and no 0
> or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals:
>
> +1:
> Michael Stack *
> Henry Saputra *
> Enis Söztutar *
> Andrew Purtell *
>
> 0:
>
> -1:
>
> * = binding
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Enis, thx for the Vote.
> >
> > There was already "commitment" from James to fix the disclaimer so I
> would
> > not think this should be a release blocker.
> >
> > Thx,
> >
> > Henry
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 12, 2014, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > - Checked the src and binary artifacts.
> > > - Checked sigs
> > > - Checked CRCs
> > > - Built the src artifacts
> > >
> > > If the DISCLAIMER file will not sink the RC, lets go ahead with
> releasing
> > > this. Otherwise we would need a new RC.
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor <jamestaylor@apache.org<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd
> like
> > > to
> > > > follow the preferred path.
> > > >
> > > > With these changes for our next release, are we good to go for this
> > > > release?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey <
> > marvin@rectangular.com <javascript:;><javascript:;>
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 AM, James Taylor <
> > jamestaylor@apache.org <javascript:;><javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Also, should we drop the ".txt"
> > > > > > extension on the NOTICE and LICENSE files for our next release?
> > > > >
> > > > >   http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name
> > > > >
> > > > >   Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and
> > > NOTICE.txt?
> > > > >
> > > > >     This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be
> > > called
> > > > >     LICENSE and NOTICE.
> > > > >
> > > > > Marvin Humphrey
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;>
> > <javascript:;>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message